PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPDX vs. MLPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPDX vs. MLPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A (MLPDX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPDX achieves a 23.53% return, which is significantly higher than MLPAX's 21.63% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPDX has outperformed MLPAX with an annualized return of 10.35%, while MLPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.05% annualized return.


MLPDX

1D
0.29%
1M
3.99%
6M
15.17%
YTD
23.53%
1Y
26.27%
3Y*
21.08%
5Y*
20.71%
10Y*
10.35%
ALL TIME*
7.62%

MLPAX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.40%
6M
14.75%
YTD
21.63%
1Y
23.21%
3Y*
23.74%
5Y*
23.55%
10Y*
9.05%
ALL TIME*
7.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MLPDX vs. MLPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPDX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A
23.53%7.69%24.00%20.32%25.11%44.69%-25.75%18.07%-13.12%-8.61%
MLPAX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A
21.63%4.31%40.77%20.43%29.07%39.45%-30.58%5.60%-15.05%-7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPDX and MLPAX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2010

0.94

The correlation between MLPDX and MLPAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPDX vs. MLPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MLPDX
MLPDX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MLPDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPAX
MLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
MLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MLPDX vs. MLPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A (MLPDX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPDXMLPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

3.86

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.96

9.31

+0.65

MLPDX vs. MLPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the MLPAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPDX and MLPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPDX vs. MLPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPDX drawdown since its inception was -77.09%, roughly equal to the maximum MLPAX drawdown of -77.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPDX and MLPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPDXMLPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.09%

-77.51%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.51%

-5.92%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.45%

-15.29%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.98%

-21.04%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.90%

-72.85%

-0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-1.49%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.30%

-16.91%

+3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.44%

+0.15%

Volatility

MLPDX vs. MLPAX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A (MLPDX) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) at 3.93%. This indicates that MLPDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPDXMLPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

3.93%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

9.26%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

11.71%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

19.02%

-1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.73%

25.97%

-0.24%

MLPDX vs. MLPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPDX has a 9.02% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPAX's 1.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPDX vs. MLPAX - Dividend Comparison

MLPDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.54%, more than MLPAX's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPAX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A
5.14%5.72%5.00%5.91%6.56%7.91%14.02%9.91%10.40%8.21%7.34%7.99%
MLPDX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A
6.54%7.51%6.42%7.72%8.49%9.74%17.44%17.48%13.70%10.99%10.00%11.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, MLPDX and MLPAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MLPDX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to MLPAX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPDX dropped -77.09% vs MLPAX's -77.51%.

MLPDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPDX and MLPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer