PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPDX vs. MLPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPDX vs. MLPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A (MLPDX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MLPDX having a 16.34% return and MLPAX slightly lower at 15.55%. Over the past 10 years, MLPDX has outperformed MLPAX with an annualized return of 9.69%, while MLPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.53% annualized return.


MLPDX

1D
0.15%
1M
-6.45%
YTD
16.34%
6M
16.54%
1Y
19.28%
3Y*
20.36%
5Y*
18.48%
10Y*
9.69%

MLPAX

1D
0.11%
1M
-5.44%
YTD
15.55%
6M
16.24%
1Y
16.65%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
21.03%
10Y*
8.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPDX vs. MLPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPDX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A
16.34%7.69%24.00%20.32%25.11%44.69%-25.75%18.07%-13.12%-8.61%
MLPAX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A
15.55%4.31%40.77%20.43%29.07%39.45%-30.58%5.60%-15.05%-7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPDX and MLPAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2010

0.94

The correlation between MLPDX and MLPAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPDX vs. MLPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPDX
MLPDX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MLPDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPAX
MLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPDX vs. MLPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A (MLPDX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPDXMLPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.84

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.80

7.27

+1.53

MLPDX vs. MLPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the MLPAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPDX and MLPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPDX vs. MLPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPDX drawdown since its inception was -77.09%, roughly equal to the maximum MLPAX drawdown of -77.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPDX and MLPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPDXMLPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.09%

-77.51%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-6.06%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.45%

-15.29%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.98%

-21.04%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.90%

-72.85%

-0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.09%

-5.82%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-17.01%

+3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.36%

-0.14%

Volatility

MLPDX vs. MLPAX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A (MLPDX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) have volatilities of 4.18% and 4.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPDXMLPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

4.20%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

8.80%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

11.37%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

19.33%

-2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.75%

25.97%

-0.22%

MLPDX vs. MLPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPDX has a 9.02% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPAX's 1.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPDX vs. MLPAX - Dividend Comparison

MLPDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, more than MLPAX's 5.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPAX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A
5.34%5.72%5.00%5.91%6.56%7.91%14.02%9.91%10.40%8.21%7.34%7.99%
MLPDX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A
6.88%7.51%6.42%7.72%8.49%9.74%17.44%17.48%13.70%10.99%10.00%11.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, MLPDX and MLPAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MLPAX has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to MLPDX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPDX dropped -77.09% vs MLPAX's -77.51%.

MLPDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPDX and MLPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer