PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPER vs. DARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OPER vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF (OPER) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPER achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 21.09% return.


OPER

1D
0.05%
1M
0.31%
6M
1.86%
YTD
2.16%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
3.76%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.81%

DARP

1D
2.96%
1M
-3.88%
6M
9.77%
YTD
21.09%
1Y
49.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
31.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$346.01K$294.81K$497.24K
$882.36K$708.61K$932.74K

OPER vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
OPER
ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF
2.16%4.37%5.34%1.88%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
21.09%40.19%24.63%6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between OPER and DARP is -0.13, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPER vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OPER
OPER Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
OPER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPER Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPER Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
OPER Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPER Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OPER vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF (OPER) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OPERDARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+13.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+40.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

12.88

1.27

+11.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

59.84

2.92

+56.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

505.14

11.11

+494.03

OPER vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPER Sharpe Ratio is 14.80, which is higher than the DARP Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPER and DARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OPER vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPER drawdown since its inception was -2.33%, smaller than the maximum DARP drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPER and DARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPERDARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.33%

-30.27%

+27.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.07%

-15.76%

+15.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.42%

+9.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-4.72%

+4.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

4.14%

-4.13%

Volatility

OPER vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF (OPER) is 0.07%, while Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a volatility of 9.87%. This indicates that OPER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPERDARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

9.87%

-9.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.20%

21.44%

-21.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27%

26.87%

-26.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.32%

26.83%

-26.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.22%

26.83%

-25.61%

OPER vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

OPER has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

OPER vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

OPER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than DARP's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.36%0.43%1.93%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OPER
ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF
3.98%4.32%5.21%5.03%1.71%0.36%0.64%2.08%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


OPER and DARP have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DARP has higher volatility (9.87%) compared to OPER (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPER dropped -2.33% vs DARP's -30.27%.

On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 49.32% vs 3.94% for OPER. On fees, OPER is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, OPER has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 49.32% return vs 3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OPER is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DARP.

OPER has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 0.36% for DARP.

OPER is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while DARP is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: ClearShares and Grizzle. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for OPER and 0.75% for DARP.

OPER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.80 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OPER and DARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer