PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPER vs. BCD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OPER vs. BCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF (OPER) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPER achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than BCD's 11.14% return.


OPER

1D
0.02%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.74%
6M
1.85%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*

BCD

1D
-1.38%
1M
-7.90%
YTD
11.14%
6M
9.67%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
10.61%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OPER vs. BCD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
OPER
ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF
1.74%4.37%5.34%5.09%1.76%0.37%0.65%2.15%0.88%
BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
11.14%15.71%6.20%-7.58%18.38%31.87%4.76%7.34%-8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between OPER and BCD is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2018

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPER vs. BCD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OPER
OPER Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
OPER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPER Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPER Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
OPER Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPER Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

BCD
BCD Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCD Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCD Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OPER vs. BCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF (OPER) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OPERBCDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+13.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+40.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

12.54

1.25

+11.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

60.59

1.69

+58.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

509.56

6.74

+502.82

OPER vs. BCD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPER Sharpe Ratio is 14.78, which is higher than the BCD Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPER and BCD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OPER vs. BCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPER drawdown since its inception was -2.33%, smaller than the maximum BCD drawdown of -29.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPER and BCD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPERBCDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.33%

-29.81%

+27.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.07%

-11.04%

+10.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.11%

-11.04%

+10.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.13%

-23.03%

+22.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.04%

+11.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-9.84%

+9.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

2.80%

-2.79%

Volatility

OPER vs. BCD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF (OPER) is 0.10%, while abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that OPER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPERBCDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.10%

3.34%

-3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.21%

12.01%

-11.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27%

13.99%

-13.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.32%

15.38%

-15.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.22%

13.90%

-12.68%

OPER vs. BCD - Expense Ratio Comparison

OPER has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BCD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

OPER vs. BCD - Dividend Comparison

OPER's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, less than BCD's 15.49% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCD
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF
15.49%17.21%3.60%4.51%5.21%8.30%1.29%1.55%1.59%0.07%
OPER
ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF
4.08%4.32%5.21%5.03%1.71%0.36%0.64%2.08%0.89%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OPER and BCD have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCD has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to OPER (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPER dropped -2.33% vs BCD's -29.81%.

On 5-year performance, BCD leads with 10.63% vs 3.69% for OPER. On fees, OPER is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, OPER has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BCD has performed better with a 10.63% return vs 3.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OPER is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for BCD.

BCD has the higher dividend yield at 15.49%, compared with 4.08% for OPER.

OPER is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while BCD is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: ClearShares and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for OPER and 0.29% for BCD.

OPER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.78 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OPER and BCD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer