PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OOQB vs. SMDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OOQB vs. SMDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) and ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 (SMDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OOQB vs. SMDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OOQB achieves a -28.69% return, which is significantly lower than SMDD's -8.06% return.


OOQB

1D
5.72%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
-28.69%
6M
-45.98%
1Y
-14.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMDD

1D
-8.39%
1M
16.17%
YTD
-8.06%
6M
-12.25%
1Y
-44.74%
3Y*
-31.21%
5Y*
-26.72%
10Y*
-39.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OOQB vs. SMDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

OOQB has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SMDD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OOQB vs. SMDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OOQB
OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

SMDD
SMDD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OOQB vs. SMDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) and ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 (SMDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OOQBSMDDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.25

-0.71

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.04

-0.84

+0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.89

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

-0.67

+0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.66

-0.84

+0.18

OOQB vs. SMDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OOQB Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is higher than the SMDD Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OOQB and SMDD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OOQBSMDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

-0.71

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.57

-0.69

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between OOQB and SMDD is -0.60. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

OOQB vs. SMDD - Dividend Comparison

OOQB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.89%, more than SMDD's 5.07% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
OOQB
Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF
13.89%9.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMDD
ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400
5.07%4.96%4.09%3.86%0.14%0.00%0.13%1.51%0.09%

Drawdowns

OOQB vs. SMDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OOQB drawdown since its inception was -53.44%, smaller than the maximum SMDD drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OOQB and SMDD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OOQBSMDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.44%

-99.99%

+46.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.44%

-67.39%

+13.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.78%

-99.98%

+49.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.94%

-92.88%

+72.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.98%

53.40%

-29.42%

Volatility

OOQB vs. SMDD - Volatility Comparison

Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) and ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 (SMDD) have volatilities of 18.69% and 19.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OOQBSMDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.69%

19.39%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.05%

35.71%

+10.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.59%

62.95%

-3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.96%

58.83%

+3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.96%

63.28%

-1.32%