ONLN vs. FXD
ONLN (ProShares Online Retail ETF) and FXD (First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - ONLN tracks the ProShares Online Retail Index while FXD tracks the StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ONLN returned -7.66%/yr vs 3.45%/yr for FXD. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ONLN charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for FXD.
Performance
ONLN vs. FXD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONLN achieves a -8.58% return, which is significantly lower than FXD's 0.06% return.
ONLN
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -5.60%
- YTD
- -8.58%
- 6M
- -9.03%
- 1Y
- 10.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.82%
- 5Y*
- -7.66%
- 10Y*
- —
FXD
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- -1.23%
- 1Y
- 10.64%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
ONLN vs. FXD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | -8.58% | 33.03% | 24.85% | 27.37% | -50.07% | -25.22% | 111.82% | 19.93% | -24.66% |
FXD First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund | 0.06% | 6.70% | 10.57% | 23.39% | -21.56% | 22.72% | 12.97% | 24.22% | -14.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONLN and FXD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2018 | 0.72 |
The correlation between ONLN and FXD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
ONLN vs. FXD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ONLN
FXD
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
ONLN
FXD
Technology
ONLN
FXD
Consumer Defensive
ONLN
FXD
Basic Materials
ONLN
-
FXD
-
Communication Services
ONLN
-
FXD
Energy
ONLN
-
FXD
Financial Services
ONLN
-
FXD
-
Healthcare
ONLN
-
FXD
-
Industrials
ONLN
-
FXD
Real Estate
ONLN
-
FXD
-
Utilities
ONLN
-
FXD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONLN vs. FXD — Risk / Return Rank
ONLN
FXD
ONLN vs. FXD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) and First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONLN | FXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.10 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 0.77 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.23 | 1.90 | -0.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONLN vs. FXD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONLN drawdown since its inception was -71.77%, which is greater than FXD's maximum drawdown of -65.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONLN and FXD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONLN | FXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.77% | -65.27% | -6.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.75% | -13.94% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.97% | -26.02% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.19% | -33.74% | -35.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.80% | -5.29% | -35.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.45% | -10.95% | -24.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.35% | 5.60% | +2.75% |
Volatility
ONLN vs. FXD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) at 5.62%. This indicates that ONLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONLN | FXD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 5.62% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.30% | 14.77% | +3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.36% | 19.48% | +4.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.15% | 22.77% | +10.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.08% | 23.69% | +8.39% |
ONLN vs. FXD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONLN has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than FXD's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
ONLN vs. FXD - Dividend Comparison
ONLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than FXD's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXD First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund | 0.76% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 0.70% | 1.00% | 0.62% | 0.42% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 0.93% | 1.05% | 0.90% |
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONLN and FXD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONLN has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to FXD (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONLN dropped -71.77% vs FXD's -65.27%.
On 5-year performance, FXD leads with 3.45% vs -7.66% for ONLN. On fees, ONLN is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, FXD has been the lower-risk option at 5.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FXD has performed better with a 3.45% return vs -7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONLN is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXD.
FXD has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.36% for ONLN.
ONLN tracks ProShares Online Retail Index, while FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for ONLN and 0.63% for FXD.
FXD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ONLN and FXD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer