ONLN vs. CLIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ONLN (ProShares Online Retail ETF) and CLIX (ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ONLN is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the ProShares Online Retail Index, while CLIX is a Long-Short fund tracking the ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ONLN returned -7.66%/yr vs -7.82%/yr for CLIX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ONLN charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CLIX.

Performance

ONLN vs. CLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) and ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ONLN having a -8.58% return and CLIX slightly higher at -8.57%.

ONLN

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: -5.60%
• YTD: -8.58%
• 6M: -9.03%
• 1Y: 10.27%
• 3Y*: 19.82%
• 5Y*: -7.66%
• 10Y*: —

CLIX

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -5.51%
• YTD: -8.57%
• 6M: -8.64%
• 1Y: 9.82%
• 3Y*: 17.63%
• 5Y*: -7.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONLN vs. CLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF	-8.58%	33.03%	24.85%	27.37%	-50.07%	-25.22%	111.82%	19.93%	-24.66%
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF	-8.57%	32.81%	20.73%	28.97%	-46.73%	-39.96%	90.91%	17.32%	-18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ONLN and CLIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2018	0.91

The correlation between ONLN and CLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ONLN vs. CLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONLN

ONLN Risk / Return Rank: 15
ONLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
ONLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
ONLN Omega Ratio Rank: 14
ONLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
ONLN Martin Ratio Rank: 15

CLIX

CLIX Risk / Return Rank: 15
CLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
CLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
CLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
CLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONLN vs. CLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) and ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ONLN	CLIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	0.46	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.74	0.76	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.09	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	0.50	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.23	1.29	-0.06

ONLN vs. CLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONLN Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is comparable to the CLIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONLN and CLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ONLN vs. CLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONLN drawdown since its inception was -71.77%, roughly equal to the maximum CLIX drawdown of -73.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONLN and CLIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONLN	CLIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.77%	-73.21%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.75%	-19.57%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.97%	-21.18%	-6.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.19%	-68.22%	-0.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.80%	-45.99%	+5.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.45%	-34.75%	-0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.35%	7.61%	+0.74%

Volatility

ONLN vs. CLIX - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) at 6.64%. This indicates that ONLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONLN	CLIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.48%	6.64%	+0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.30%	16.31%	+1.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.36%	21.47%	+2.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.15%	27.05%	+6.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.08%	25.92%	+6.16%

ONLN vs. CLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONLN has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than CLIX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

ONLN vs. CLIX - Dividend Comparison

ONLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than CLIX's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF	0.58%	0.46%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.33%
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF	0.36%	0.30%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONLN and CLIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, ONLN and CLIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ONLN or CLIX?

ONLN has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to CLIX (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONLN dropped -71.77% vs CLIX's -73.21%.

Which ETF is better, ONLN or CLIX?

On 5-year performance, ONLN leads with -7.66% vs -7.82% for CLIX. On fees, ONLN is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, CLIX has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ONLN or CLIX?

Over the 5-year period, ONLN has performed better with a -7.66% return vs -7.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONLN or CLIX?

ONLN is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CLIX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONLN or CLIX?

CLIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.36% for ONLN.

What is the main difference between ONLN and CLIX?

ONLN is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while CLIX is Long-Short. ONLN tracks ProShares Online Retail Index, while CLIX tracks ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for ONLN and 0.65% for CLIX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.