ONEV vs. QLVE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ONEV (SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF) and QLVE (FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ONEV is a Low Volatility fund tracking the Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR), while QLVE is a Quality Factor fund tracking the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ONEV returned 9.02%/yr vs 7.36%/yr for QLVE. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ONEV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QLVE.

Performance

ONEV vs. QLVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ONEV having a 12.96% return and QLVE slightly lower at 12.95%.

ONEV

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 1.98%
• 6M: 8.95%
• YTD: 12.96%
• 1Y: 18.50%
• 3Y*: 12.66%
• 5Y*: 9.02%
• 10Y*: 11.48%
• ALL TIME*: 11.73%

QLVE

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.55%
• 6M: 6.27%
• YTD: 12.95%
• 1Y: 23.63%
• 3Y*: 16.01%
• 5Y*: 7.36%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF	$449.28K	$3.31M	$4.48M
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund	$10.04K	$10.92K	$21.05K

ONEV vs. QLVE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF	12.96%	8.14%	11.76%	13.28%	-8.15%	29.19%	6.66%	7.20%
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund	12.95%	21.87%	10.17%	8.53%	-13.10%	0.90%	4.16%	4.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEV and QLVE is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019	0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between ONEV and QLVE has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ONEV vs. QLVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ONEV	QLVE
Industrials	17.7%	3.3%
Financial Services	17.0%	14.3%
Healthcare	12.3%	4.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	9.1%	6.3%
Technology	8.3%	35.7%
Real Estate	8.3%	0.7%
Utilities	8.2%	2.7%
Basic Materials	2.7%	1.9%
Communication Services	2.7%	10.0%
Energy	2.3%	6.3%

Return for Risk

ONEV vs. QLVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ONEV

ONEV Risk / Return Rank: 67
ONEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ONEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ONEV Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ONEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
ONEV Martin Ratio Rank: 66

QLVE

QLVE Risk / Return Rank: 51
QLVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
QLVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QLVE Omega Ratio Rank: 52
QLVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
QLVE Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ONEV vs. QLVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ONEV	QLVE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.22	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	1.78	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.25	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	2.05	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.28	6.71	+1.57

ONEV vs. QLVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the QLVE Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEV and QLVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ONEV vs. QLVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEV drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, which is greater than QLVE's maximum drawdown of -29.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEV and QLVE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEV	QLVE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.72%	-29.96%	-9.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.75%	-11.60%	+3.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.81%	-13.29%	-1.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.52%	-23.60%	+5.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-5.56%	+4.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-8.21%	+4.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	3.53%	-1.29%

Volatility

ONEV vs. QLVE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) is 4.39%, while FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a volatility of 6.70%. This indicates that ONEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEV	QLVE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	6.70%	-2.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.52%	17.08%	-8.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.54%	19.48%	-7.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.60%	14.20%	+0.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.03%	16.14%	+0.89%

ONEV vs. QLVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QLVE's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

ONEV vs. QLVE - Dividend Comparison

ONEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than QLVE's 2.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF	1.79%	1.81%	1.88%	1.79%	1.80%	1.44%	1.87%	2.07%	2.14%	6.91%	3.73%	0.21%
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund	2.68%	3.14%	3.11%	3.00%	2.48%	2.57%	1.66%	1.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONEV and QLVE in my portfolio?

ONEV and QLVE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ONEV or QLVE?

QLVE has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to ONEV (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEV dropped -39.72% vs QLVE's -29.96%.

Which ETF is better, ONEV or QLVE?

On 5-year performance, ONEV leads with 9.02% vs 7.36% for QLVE. On fees, ONEV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ONEV or QLVE?

Over the 5-year period, ONEV has performed better with a 9.02% return vs 7.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONEV or QLVE?

ONEV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QLVE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONEV or QLVE?

QLVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 1.79% for ONEV.

What is the main difference between ONEV and QLVE?

ONEV is categorized as Low Volatility, while QLVE is Quality Factor. ONEV tracks Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR), while QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEV and 0.40% for QLVE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.