ONEV vs. ACWV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ONEV (SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF) and ACWV (iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ONEV is a Low Volatility fund tracking the Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR), while ACWV is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ONEV returned 11.48%/yr vs 7.22%/yr for ACWV. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

ONEV vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEV achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly higher than ACWV's 5.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEV has outperformed ACWV with an annualized return of 11.48%, while ACWV has yielded a comparatively lower 7.22% annualized return.

ONEV

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 1.98%
• 6M: 8.95%
• YTD: 12.96%
• 1Y: 18.50%
• 3Y*: 12.66%
• 5Y*: 9.02%
• 10Y*: 11.48%
• ALL TIME*: 11.73%

ACWV

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 2.00%
• 6M: 3.53%
• YTD: 5.77%
• 1Y: 8.71%
• 3Y*: 10.89%
• 5Y*: 5.71%
• 10Y*: 7.22%
• ALL TIME*: 8.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	$13.15M	$11.49M	$12.64M
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF	$449.28K	$3.31M	$4.48M

ONEV vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF	12.96%	8.14%	11.76%	13.28%	-8.15%	29.19%	6.66%	30.66%	-5.30%	18.11%
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	5.77%	11.04%	11.38%	8.23%	-10.36%	13.97%	3.04%	21.04%	-1.42%	18.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEV and ACWV is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015	0.72

The correlation between ONEV and ACWV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ONEV vs. ACWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ONEV	ACWV
Industrials	17.7%	8.1%
Financial Services	17.0%	13.5%
Healthcare	12.3%	13.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	9.1%	9.7%
Technology	8.3%	25.3%
Real Estate	8.3%	0.6%
Utilities	8.2%	7.5%
Basic Materials	2.7%	1.5%
Communication Services	2.7%	11.3%
Energy	2.3%	3.5%

Return for Risk

ONEV vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ONEV

ONEV Risk / Return Rank: 67
ONEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ONEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ONEV Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ONEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
ONEV Martin Ratio Rank: 66

ACWV

ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 41
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ONEV vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ONEV	ACWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.09	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	1.63	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.20	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	1.37	+1.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.28	3.90	+4.38

ONEV vs. ACWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the ACWV Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEV and ACWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ONEV vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEV drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, which is greater than ACWV's maximum drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEV and ACWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEV	ACWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.72%	-28.82%	-10.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.75%	-6.37%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.81%	-7.56%	-7.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.52%	-18.14%	-0.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.72%	-28.82%	-10.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-0.34%	-1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-3.10%	-0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	2.24%	0.00%

Volatility

ONEV vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 2.32%. This indicates that ONEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEV	ACWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	2.32%	+2.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.52%	6.41%	+2.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.54%	8.05%	+3.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.60%	10.30%	+4.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.03%	12.30%	+4.73%

ONEV vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ONEV and ACWV have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ONEV vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

ONEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than ACWV's 1.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF	1.90%	2.09%	2.33%	2.41%	2.18%	1.92%	1.77%	2.54%	2.32%	2.04%	2.56%	2.28%
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF	1.79%	1.81%	1.88%	1.79%	1.80%	1.44%	1.87%	2.07%	2.14%	6.91%	3.73%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONEV and ACWV in my portfolio?

ONEV and ACWV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ONEV or ACWV?

ONEV has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to ACWV (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEV dropped -39.72% vs ACWV's -28.82%.

Which ETF is better, ONEV or ACWV?

On 10-year performance, ONEV leads with 11.48% vs 7.22% for ACWV. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, ACWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ONEV or ACWV?

Over the 10-year period, ONEV has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 7.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONEV or ACWV?

ONEV and ACWV have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONEV or ACWV?

ACWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.79% for ONEV.

What is the main difference between ONEV and ACWV?

ONEV is categorized as Low Volatility, while ACWV is Global Equities. ONEV tracks Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR), while ACWV tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.