PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEO vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEO vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEO achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 8.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEO has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 12.20%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.60% annualized return.


ONEO

1D
0.28%
1M
3.11%
YTD
17.68%
6M
15.75%
1Y
25.56%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
12.20%

SPYM

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
8.09%
6M
6.76%
1Y
22.22%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
15.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEO vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
17.68%10.61%15.01%15.64%-12.01%26.72%10.76%26.53%-12.41%21.16%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
8.09%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEO and SPYM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.85

The correlation between ONEO and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEO vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEO
SPYM

Technology

25.6%
38.0%

Industrials

17.1%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
9.4%

Healthcare

9.4%
8.5%

Financial Services

8.8%
11.9%

Energy

6.5%
3.1%

Utilities

5.4%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.6%

Basic Materials

4.7%
1.8%

Communication Services

3.5%
10.1%

Real Estate

2.8%
1.8%

Technology

ONEO
25.6%
SPYM
38.0%

Industrials

ONEO
17.1%
SPYM
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEO
11.3%
SPYM
9.4%

Healthcare

ONEO
9.4%
SPYM
8.5%

Financial Services

ONEO
8.8%
SPYM
11.9%

Energy

ONEO
6.5%
SPYM
3.1%

Utilities

ONEO
5.4%
SPYM
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

ONEO
5.0%
SPYM
4.6%

Basic Materials

ONEO
4.7%
SPYM
1.8%

Communication Services

ONEO
3.5%
SPYM
10.1%

Real Estate

ONEO
2.8%
SPYM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEO vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEO
ONEO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ONEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEO vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONEOSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

2.51

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.64

11.16

+2.49

ONEO vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEO and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEO vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEO drawdown since its inception was -40.86%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEO and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEOSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.86%

-54.46%

+13.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-8.90%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

-18.72%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.39%

-24.48%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.86%

-33.87%

-6.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-3.25%

+2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.97%

-7.14%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.00%

-0.12%

Volatility

ONEO vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) have volatilities of 4.87% and 4.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEOSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

4.81%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

9.80%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.36%

12.43%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.29%

16.90%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.69%

18.03%

+0.66%

ONEO vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ONEO vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

ONEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than SPYM's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
1.19%1.29%1.30%1.56%1.73%1.19%1.28%1.64%1.72%7.69%1.82%0.17%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.30%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEO and SPYM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEO has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to SPYM (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEO dropped -40.86% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.60% vs 12.20% for ONEO. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.60% return vs 12.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ONEO.

SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 1.19% for ONEO.

ONEO is categorized as Momentum, while SPYM is S&P 500. ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEO and 0.02% for SPYM.

ONEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEO and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer