ONEO vs. MMTM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ONEO (SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF) and MMTM (SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF) are both Momentum funds from State Street - ONEO tracks the Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index while MMTM tracks the S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ONEO returned 11.94%/yr vs 15.00%/yr for MMTM. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ONEO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for MMTM.

Performance

ONEO vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEO achieves a 17.85% return, which is significantly higher than MMTM's 9.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEO has underperformed MMTM with an annualized return of 11.94%, while MMTM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.00% annualized return.

ONEO

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 6.36%
• YTD: 17.85%
• 6M: 18.38%
• 1Y: 27.50%
• 3Y*: 19.36%
• 5Y*: 10.50%
• 10Y*: 11.94%

MMTM

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: 2.46%
• YTD: 9.16%
• 6M: 9.58%
• 1Y: 24.27%
• 3Y*: 22.46%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: 15.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEO vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF	17.85%	10.61%	15.01%	15.64%	-12.01%	26.72%	10.76%	26.53%	-12.41%	21.16%
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF	9.16%	13.26%	29.94%	22.49%	-16.12%	26.33%	19.27%	29.98%	-4.62%	24.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEO and MMTM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2015	0.76

The correlation between ONEO and MMTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ONEO vs. MMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ONEO	MMTM
Technology	21.9%	29.5%
Industrials	18.0%	7.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	12.4%
Healthcare	9.5%	10.8%
Financial Services	9.4%	16.0%
Energy	7.3%	1.7%
Utilities	5.8%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	6.7%
Basic Materials	4.7%	2.0%
Communication Services	3.6%	7.7%
Real Estate	2.9%	3.1%

Return for Risk

ONEO vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEO

ONEO Risk / Return Rank: 69
ONEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
ONEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
ONEO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
ONEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
ONEO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

MMTM

MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 51
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 49
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEO vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ONEO	MMTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	1.72	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	2.40	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.31	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.75	2.46	+1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.86	11.15	+3.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ONEO vs. MMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the MMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEO and MMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ONEO	MMTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	1.72	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.75	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.81	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.85	-0.22

Drawdowns

ONEO vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEO drawdown since its inception was -40.86%, which is greater than MMTM's maximum drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEO and MMTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEO	MMTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.86%	-33.85%	-7.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.37%	-9.89%	+2.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.72%	-22.08%	+2.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.39%	-23.72%	+1.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.86%	-33.85%	-7.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.48%	+1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.00%	-4.20%	-0.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	2.18%	-0.32%

Volatility

ONEO vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) at 2.35%. This indicates that ONEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEO	MMTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.77%	2.35%	+1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.66%	10.73%	-1.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.84%	14.19%	-1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.22%	18.20%	-0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.66%	18.65%	+0.01%

ONEO vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ONEO vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison

ONEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than MMTM's 0.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF	0.78%	0.86%	0.83%	1.16%	1.67%	0.95%	1.14%	1.55%	1.64%	1.52%	1.98%	1.68%
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF	1.16%	1.29%	1.30%	1.56%	1.73%	1.19%	1.28%	1.64%	1.72%	7.69%	1.82%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONEO and MMTM in my portfolio?

ONEO and MMTM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ONEO or MMTM?

ONEO has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to MMTM (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEO dropped -40.86% vs MMTM's -33.85%.

Which ETF is better, ONEO or MMTM?

On 10-year performance, MMTM leads with 15.00% vs 11.94% for ONEO. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ONEO or MMTM?

Over the 10-year period, MMTM has performed better with a 15.00% return vs 11.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONEO or MMTM?

MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ONEO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONEO or MMTM?

ONEO has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.78% for MMTM.

What is the main difference between ONEO and MMTM?

ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index, while MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEO and 0.12% for MMTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.