ONEO vs. IMOM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ONEO (SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF) and IMOM (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - ONEO tracks the Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index while IMOM tracks the Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ONEO returned 11.94%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for IMOM. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ONEO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IMOM.

Performance

ONEO vs. IMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ONEO having a 17.85% return and IMOM slightly higher at 18.05%. Over the past 10 years, ONEO has outperformed IMOM with an annualized return of 11.94%, while IMOM has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.

ONEO

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 6.36%
• YTD: 17.85%
• 6M: 18.38%
• 1Y: 27.50%
• 3Y*: 19.36%
• 5Y*: 10.50%
• 10Y*: 11.94%

IMOM

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 2.41%
• YTD: 18.05%
• 6M: 22.47%
• 1Y: 42.66%
• 3Y*: 25.09%
• 5Y*: 8.44%
• 10Y*: 7.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEO vs. IMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF	17.85%	10.61%	15.01%	15.64%	-12.01%	26.72%	10.76%	26.53%	-12.41%	21.16%
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF	18.05%	47.20%	5.22%	9.15%	-21.92%	-0.75%	28.39%	18.26%	-23.07%	34.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEO and IMOM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.58

The correlation between ONEO and IMOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ONEO vs. IMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ONEO	IMOM
Technology	21.9%	15.8%
Industrials	18.0%	33.2%
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	1.7%
Healthcare	9.5%	3.3%
Financial Services	9.4%	4.1%
Energy	7.3%	1.9%
Utilities	5.8%	12.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	-
Basic Materials	4.7%	19.4%
Communication Services	3.6%	3.9%
Real Estate	2.9%	4.2%

Return for Risk

ONEO vs. IMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEO

ONEO Risk / Return Rank: 69
ONEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
ONEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
ONEO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
ONEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
ONEO Martin Ratio Rank: 77

IMOM

IMOM Risk / Return Rank: 62
IMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
IMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
IMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 65
IMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
IMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEO vs. IMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ONEO	IMOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.20	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	2.94	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.40	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.75	2.75	+1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.86	11.57	+3.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ONEO vs. IMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the IMOM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEO and IMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ONEO	IMOM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	2.20	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.43	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.39	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.40	+0.23

Drawdowns

ONEO vs. IMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEO drawdown since its inception was -40.86%, smaller than the maximum IMOM drawdown of -45.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEO and IMOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEO	IMOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.86%	-45.74%	+4.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.37%	-15.61%	+8.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.72%	-17.51%	-2.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.39%	-39.27%	+16.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.86%	-45.74%	+4.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.45%	+2.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.00%	-14.18%	+9.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	3.70%	-1.84%

Volatility

ONEO vs. IMOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) is 3.77%, while Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that ONEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEO	IMOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.77%	6.44%	-2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.66%	16.74%	-7.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.84%	19.50%	-6.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.22%	19.85%	-2.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.66%	20.20%	-1.54%

ONEO vs. IMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IMOM's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

ONEO vs. IMOM - Dividend Comparison

ONEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than IMOM's 2.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF	2.14%	2.53%	4.52%	2.95%	6.06%	1.27%	0.59%	1.17%	0.78%	1.11%	0.54%	0.00%
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF	1.16%	1.29%	1.30%	1.56%	1.73%	1.19%	1.28%	1.64%	1.72%	7.69%	1.82%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONEO and IMOM in my portfolio?

ONEO and IMOM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ONEO or IMOM?

IMOM has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to ONEO (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEO dropped -40.86% vs IMOM's -45.74%.

Which ETF is better, ONEO or IMOM?

On 10-year performance, ONEO leads with 11.94% vs 7.93% for IMOM. On fees, ONEO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEO has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ONEO or IMOM?

Over the 10-year period, ONEO has performed better with a 11.94% return vs 7.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONEO or IMOM?

ONEO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IMOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONEO or IMOM?

IMOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 1.16% for ONEO.

What is the main difference between ONEO and IMOM?

ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index, while IMOM tracks Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEO and 0.38% for IMOM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.