ONEO vs. FMDE
ONEO (SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF) and FMDE (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ONEO is a Momentum fund tracking the Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index, while FMDE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. ONEO is passively managed, while FMDE is actively managed. Over the past year, ONEO returned 25.56% vs 18.57% for FMDE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ONEO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for FMDE.
Performance
ONEO vs. FMDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONEO achieves a 17.68% return, which is significantly higher than FMDE's 10.87% return.
ONEO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 6M
- 15.75%
- 1Y
- 25.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.68%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.20%
FMDE
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 10.87%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- 1Y
- 18.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ONEO vs. FMDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF | 17.68% | 10.61% | 15.01% | 8.52% |
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 10.87% | 12.19% | 21.76% | 9.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEO and FMDE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023 | 0.96 |
The correlation between ONEO and FMDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
ONEO vs. FMDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ONEO
FMDE
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
ONEO
FMDE
Industrials
ONEO
FMDE
Consumer Cyclical
ONEO
FMDE
Healthcare
ONEO
FMDE
Financial Services
ONEO
FMDE
Energy
ONEO
FMDE
Utilities
ONEO
FMDE
Consumer Defensive
ONEO
FMDE
Basic Materials
ONEO
FMDE
Communication Services
ONEO
FMDE
Real Estate
ONEO
FMDE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEO vs. FMDE — Risk / Return Rank
ONEO
FMDE
ONEO vs. FMDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONEO | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.23 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 2.24 | +1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.64 | 8.78 | +4.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONEO vs. FMDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEO drawdown since its inception was -40.86%, which is greater than FMDE's maximum drawdown of -21.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEO and FMDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEO | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.86% | -21.10% | -19.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.37% | -8.33% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -0.88% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -2.61% | -2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 2.12% | -0.24% |
Volatility
ONEO vs. FMDE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) at 4.54%. This indicates that ONEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEO | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 4.54% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.44% | 10.51% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.36% | 14.01% | -0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 16.16% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 16.16% | +2.53% |
ONEO vs. FMDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONEO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FMDE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ONEO vs. FMDE - Dividend Comparison
ONEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than FMDE's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 1.09% | 1.23% | 1.11% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF | 1.19% | 1.29% | 1.30% | 1.56% | 1.73% | 1.19% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 7.69% | 1.82% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, ONEO and FMDE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ONEO has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to FMDE (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEO dropped -40.86% vs FMDE's -21.10%.
On 1-year performance, ONEO leads with 25.56% vs 18.57% for FMDE. On fees, ONEO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FMDE has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ONEO has performed better with a 25.56% return vs 18.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONEO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for FMDE.
ONEO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 1.09% for FMDE.
ONEO is categorized as Momentum, while FMDE is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEO and 0.23% for FMDE.
ONEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ONEO and FMDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer