ONEH vs. SPYH
ONEH (TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF) and SPYH (NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ONEH charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for SPYH.
Performance
ONEH vs. SPYH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ONEH
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYH
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 5.00%
- YTD
- 6.29%
- 1Y
- 15.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ONEH vs. SPYH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ONEH TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF | -2.12% |
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 4.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEH and SPYH is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEH vs. SPYH — Risk / Return Rank
ONEH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPYH
ONEH vs. SPYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF (ONEH) and NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONEH | SPYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONEH vs. SPYH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEH drawdown since its inception was -3.55%, smaller than the maximum SPYH drawdown of -7.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEH and SPYH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEH | SPYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -7.22% | +3.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | 0.00% | -2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -0.77% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.33% | — |
Volatility
ONEH vs. SPYH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEH | SPYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.15% | 8.26% | -3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 12.25% | -7.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 12.25% | -7.10% |
ONEH vs. SPYH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONEH has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYH's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ONEH vs. SPYH - Dividend Comparison
ONEH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ONEH TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYH NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 7.60% | 5.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONEH and SPYH have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYH is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYH is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ONEH.
SPYH has the higher dividend yield at 7.60%, compared with 0.00% for ONEH.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ONEH and 0.68% for SPYH.
Find the right allocation for ONEH and SPYH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer