OND vs. SSO
OND (ProShares On-Demand ETF) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - OND is a Communications Equities fund tracking the FactSet On-Demand Index, while SSO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OND returned 11.90%/yr vs 30.77%/yr for SSO. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. OND charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
OND vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OND achieves a -15.89% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 16.14% return.
OND
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -11.55%
- YTD
- -15.89%
- 1Y
- -17.52%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.61%
SSO
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- YTD
- 16.14%
- 1Y
- 37.35%
- 3Y*
- 30.77%
- 5Y*
- 17.16%
- 10Y*
- 23.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.36K | $4.57K | $11.88K | |
| $177.82M | $191.16M | $223.05M |
OND vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | -15.89% | 26.72% | 32.00% | 27.03% | -41.93% | -15.04% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 16.14% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 8.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between OND and SSO is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021 | 0.73 |
The correlation between OND and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
OND vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OND
SSO
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
OND
SSO
Technology
OND
SSO
Consumer Cyclical
OND
SSO
Industrials
OND
SSO
Real Estate
OND
SSO
Basic Materials
OND
-
SSO
Consumer Defensive
OND
-
SSO
Energy
OND
-
SSO
Financial Services
OND
-
SSO
Healthcare
OND
-
SSO
Utilities
OND
-
SSO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OND vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
OND
SSO
OND vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OND | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.23 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 1.81 | -2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 7.25 | -8.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OND vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OND drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, smaller than the maximum SSO drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OND and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OND | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.02% | -84.67% | +25.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.80% | -18.17% | -15.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.80% | -35.21% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.12% | -4.07% | -25.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.27% | -19.45% | -10.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.38% | 4.54% | +16.84% |
Volatility
OND vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) is 5.56%, while ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) has a volatility of 7.07%. This indicates that OND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OND | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 7.07% | -1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.70% | 20.14% | -3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.12% | 25.63% | -4.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 33.88% | -6.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.97% | 35.91% | -8.94% |
OND vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
OND has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
OND vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
OND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.67% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OND and SSO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSO has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to OND (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OND dropped -59.02% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 3-year performance, SSO leads with 30.77% vs 11.90% for OND. On fees, OND is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, OND has been the lower-risk option at 5.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SSO has performed better with a 30.77% return vs 11.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OND is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SSO.
SSO has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for OND.
OND is categorized as Communications Equities, while SSO is Leveraged Equities. OND tracks FactSet On-Demand Index, while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for OND and 0.87% for SSO.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OND and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer