OND vs. IBID

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OND (ProShares On-Demand ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OND is a Communications Equities fund tracking the FactSet On-Demand Index, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, OND returned -17.46% vs 3.92% for IBID. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OND charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.

Performance

OND vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OND achieves a -18.87% return, which is significantly lower than IBID's 1.94% return.

OND

• 1D: -2.16%
• 1M: -5.24%
• YTD: -18.87%
• 6M: -19.28%
• 1Y: -17.46%
• 3Y*: 13.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBID

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 3.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OND vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF	-18.87%	26.72%	32.00%	10.26%
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	1.94%	5.66%	4.71%	2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between OND and IBID is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	0.03

The correlation between OND and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

OND vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OND

OND Risk / Return Rank: 3
OND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
OND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
OND Omega Ratio Rank: 3
OND Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
OND Martin Ratio Rank: 5

IBID

IBID Risk / Return Rank: 95
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OND vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OND	IBID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.84	3.19	-4.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.10	5.38	-6.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.72	-0.84
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	7.20	-7.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.92	29.14	-30.06

OND vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OND Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OND and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OND vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OND drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OND and IBID.

Drawdown Indicators

	OND	IBID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.02%	-1.28%	-57.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.80%	-0.55%	-33.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.63%	-0.55%	-31.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.29%	-0.22%	-30.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.06%	0.13%	+18.93%

Volatility

OND vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that OND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OND	IBID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.52%	0.35%	+6.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.83%	0.86%	+14.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.91%	1.23%	+19.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.10%	2.24%	+24.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.10%	2.24%	+24.86%

OND vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

OND has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

OND vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

OND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	3.68%	4.43%	4.24%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.78%	0.00%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OND and IBID in my portfolio?

OND and IBID have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OND or IBID?

OND has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OND dropped -59.02% vs IBID's -1.28%.

Which ETF is better, OND or IBID?

On 1-year performance, IBID leads with 3.92% vs -17.46% for OND. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OND or IBID?

Over the 1-year period, IBID has performed better with a 3.92% return vs -17.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OND or IBID?

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for OND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OND or IBID?

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.00% for OND.

What is the main difference between OND and IBID?

OND is categorized as Communications Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. OND tracks FactSet On-Demand Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for OND and 0.10% for IBID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.