OND vs. DBO
OND (ProShares On-Demand ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - OND is a Communications Equities fund tracking the FactSet On-Demand Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OND returned 17.30%/yr vs 20.95%/yr for DBO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OND charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
OND vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OND achieves a -12.34% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 80.66% return.
OND
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- -12.34%
- 6M
- -15.06%
- 1Y
- -6.53%
- 3Y*
- 17.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 80.66%
- 6M
- 78.46%
- 1Y
- 78.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 15.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
OND vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | -12.34% | 26.72% | 32.00% | 27.03% | -41.93% | -14.36% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 80.66% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | -9.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between OND and DBO is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.05 |
The correlation between OND and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OND vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OND
DBO
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
OND
DBO
-
Communication Services
OND
DBO
-
Industrials
OND
DBO
-
Real Estate
OND
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
OND
DBO
-
Basic Materials
OND
-
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
OND
-
DBO
-
Energy
OND
-
DBO
-
Financial Services
OND
-
DBO
Healthcare
OND
-
DBO
-
Utilities
OND
-
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OND vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
OND
DBO
OND vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OND | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | 2.28 | -2.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | 2.88 | -3.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.37 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 4.62 | -4.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | 9.43 | -9.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OND | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 | 2.28 | -2.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 0.02 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
OND vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OND drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OND and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OND | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.02% | -90.18% | +31.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.80% | -18.19% | -15.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.80% | -28.20% | -5.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.13% | -52.46% | +26.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.32% | -62.25% | +31.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.73% | 8.92% | +8.81% |
Volatility
OND vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) is 4.88%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 13.25%. This indicates that OND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OND | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 13.25% | -8.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.25% | 28.15% | -12.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.48% | 34.54% | -14.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.14% | 32.28% | -5.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.14% | 31.78% | -4.64% |
OND vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
OND has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
OND vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
OND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.94% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OND and DBO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to OND (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OND dropped -59.02% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 20.95% vs 17.30% for OND. On fees, OND is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, OND has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 20.95% return vs 17.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OND is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.00% for OND.
OND is categorized as Communications Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. OND tracks FactSet On-Demand Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for OND and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OND and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer