OMFL vs. VXUS
OMFL (Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OMFL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OMFL returned 8.96%/yr vs 8.24%/yr for VXUS. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OMFL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
OMFL vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMFL achieves a 11.16% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 13.24% return.
OMFL
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 11.16%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- 1Y
- 20.69%
- 3Y*
- 13.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- 3.33%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 13.24%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- 28.59%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
OMFL vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 11.16% | 13.68% | 6.82% | 21.53% | -13.97% | 28.95% | 20.91% | 35.58% | -2.55% | 5.12% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 13.24% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 2.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMFL and VXUS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.73 |
The correlation between OMFL and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
OMFL vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OMFL
VXUS
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
OMFL
VXUS
Communication Services
OMFL
VXUS
Financial Services
OMFL
VXUS
Healthcare
OMFL
VXUS
Industrials
OMFL
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
OMFL
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
OMFL
VXUS
Energy
OMFL
VXUS
Basic Materials
OMFL
VXUS
Real Estate
OMFL
VXUS
Utilities
OMFL
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMFL vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
OMFL
VXUS
OMFL vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OMFL | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.33 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 2.55 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.17 | 9.77 | +2.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OMFL vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMFL drawdown since its inception was -33.24%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFL and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMFL | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.24% | -35.97% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -11.27% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.52% | -13.58% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.44% | -29.44% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | -1.86% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.79% | -8.21% | +3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 2.93% | -1.23% |
Volatility
OMFL vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) is 3.69%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that OMFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMFL | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 6.78% | -3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.93% | 14.05% | -4.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 16.09% | -3.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 16.21% | +0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 17.20% | +2.90% |
OMFL vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
OMFL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
OMFL vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
OMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than VXUS's 2.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 0.76% | 0.80% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.55% | 0.95% | 1.48% | 1.53% | 1.39% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.68% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OMFL and VXUS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to OMFL (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMFL dropped -33.24% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 5-year performance, OMFL leads with 8.96% vs 8.24% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, OMFL has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OMFL has performed better with a 8.96% return vs 8.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for OMFL.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.76% for OMFL.
OMFL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. OMFL tracks Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for OMFL and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMFL and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer