PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OMFL vs. USPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OMFL vs. USPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMFL achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly higher than USPX's 11.16% return.


OMFL

1D
0.57%
1M
4.06%
YTD
13.03%
6M
13.27%
1Y
22.59%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*

USPX

1D
0.47%
1M
4.77%
YTD
11.16%
6M
10.90%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
12.50%
10Y*
12.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMFL vs. USPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OMFL
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
13.03%13.68%6.82%21.53%-13.97%28.95%20.91%35.58%-2.55%4.95%
USPX
Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF
11.16%17.78%24.97%27.07%-18.88%19.53%9.72%26.60%-7.78%3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between OMFL and USPX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2017

0.80

The correlation between OMFL and USPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.92 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OMFL vs. USPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OMFL
USPX

Technology

31.0%
35.4%

Communication Services

11.7%
11.5%

Financial Services

11.5%
11.8%

Healthcare

10.4%
8.6%

Industrials

9.8%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.8%
4.8%

Energy

3.7%
3.6%

Basic Materials

2.5%
1.7%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.8%

Utilities

0.4%
2.3%

Technology

OMFL
31.0%
USPX
35.4%

Communication Services

OMFL
11.7%
USPX
11.5%

Financial Services

OMFL
11.5%
USPX
11.8%

Healthcare

OMFL
10.4%
USPX
8.6%

Industrials

OMFL
9.8%
USPX
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

OMFL
9.5%
USPX
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

OMFL
8.8%
USPX
4.8%

Energy

OMFL
3.7%
USPX
3.6%

Basic Materials

OMFL
2.5%
USPX
1.7%

Real Estate

OMFL
0.8%
USPX
1.8%

Utilities

OMFL
0.4%
USPX
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OMFL vs. USPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMFL
OMFL Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
OMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
OMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

USPX
USPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
USPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
USPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
USPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
USPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMFL vs. USPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OMFLUSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.42

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

3.07

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.48

14.01

-0.53

OMFL vs. USPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the USPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMFL and USPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OMFLUSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.33

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.78

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.80

-0.10

Drawdowns

OMFL vs. USPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMFL drawdown since its inception was -33.24%, which is greater than USPX's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFL and USPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OMFLUSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.24%

-31.21%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-9.15%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.52%

-19.21%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.44%

-24.60%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.29%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-4.44%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.00%

-0.32%

Volatility

OMFL vs. USPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) is 2.28%, while Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that OMFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OMFLUSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

2.83%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

9.17%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

12.09%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.75%

16.17%

+0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.10%

15.91%

+4.19%

OMFL vs. USPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMFL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than USPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

OMFL vs. USPX - Dividend Comparison

OMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than USPX's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
OMFL
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
0.75%0.80%1.22%1.37%1.55%0.95%1.48%1.53%1.39%0.32%0.00%
USPX
Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF
1.03%1.07%1.23%1.35%2.21%2.40%2.51%3.07%2.91%2.60%4.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, OMFL and USPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USPX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to OMFL (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMFL dropped -33.24% vs USPX's -31.21%.

On 5-year performance, USPX leads with 12.50% vs 9.39% for OMFL. On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, OMFL has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USPX has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for OMFL.

USPX has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.75% for OMFL.

OMFL tracks Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while USPX tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for OMFL and 0.03% for USPX.

USPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OMFL and USPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer