OMFL vs. SOXQ
OMFL (Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OMFL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OMFL returned 14.35%/yr vs 59.40%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OMFL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
OMFL vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMFL achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 96.72% return.
OMFL
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 6M
- 12.90%
- 1Y
- 21.98%
- 3Y*
- 14.35%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- —
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMFL vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 12.39% | 13.68% | 6.82% | 21.53% | -13.97% | 8.83% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMFL and SOXQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.68 |
The correlation between OMFL and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
OMFL vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OMFL
SOXQ
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
OMFL
SOXQ
Communication Services
OMFL
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
OMFL
SOXQ
Healthcare
OMFL
SOXQ
-
Industrials
OMFL
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
OMFL
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
OMFL
SOXQ
-
Energy
OMFL
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
OMFL
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
OMFL
SOXQ
-
Utilities
OMFL
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMFL vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
OMFL
SOXQ
OMFL vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OMFL | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.72 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 11.73 | -8.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.12 | 45.01 | -31.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OMFL | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 5.43 | -3.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.98 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
OMFL vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMFL drawdown since its inception was -33.24%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFL and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMFL | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.24% | -46.01% | +12.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -15.59% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.52% | -39.36% | +23.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | 0.00% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -12.96% | +8.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 4.06% | -2.38% |
Volatility
OMFL vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) is 2.40%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that OMFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMFL | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.40% | 13.44% | -11.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | 26.70% | -17.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 33.78% | -21.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 36.38% | -19.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.11% | 36.38% | -16.27% |
OMFL vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OMFL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
OMFL vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
OMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 0.75% | 0.80% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.55% | 0.95% | 1.48% | 1.53% | 1.39% | 0.32% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OMFL and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to OMFL (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMFL dropped -33.24% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 14.35% for OMFL. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, OMFL has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 14.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for OMFL.
OMFL has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
OMFL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. OMFL tracks Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for OMFL and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMFL and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer