PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OMFL vs. SOXQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OMFL vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMFL achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 96.72% return.


OMFL

1D
-0.10%
1M
4.53%
YTD
12.39%
6M
12.90%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
14.35%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*

SOXQ

1D
1.42%
1M
32.12%
YTD
96.72%
6M
91.61%
1Y
181.76%
3Y*
59.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMFL vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
OMFL
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
12.39%13.68%6.82%21.53%-13.97%8.83%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
96.72%43.11%20.16%66.74%-35.59%24.82%

Correlation

The correlation between OMFL and SOXQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021

0.68

The correlation between OMFL and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

OMFL vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OMFL
SOXQ

Technology

31.0%
100.0%

Communication Services

11.7%

-

Financial Services

11.5%
0.0%

Healthcare

10.4%

-

Industrials

9.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.8%

-

Energy

3.7%

-

Basic Materials

2.5%

-

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Utilities

0.4%

-

Technology

OMFL
31.0%
SOXQ
100.0%

Communication Services

OMFL
11.7%
SOXQ

-

Financial Services

OMFL
11.5%
SOXQ
0.0%

Healthcare

OMFL
10.4%
SOXQ

-

Industrials

OMFL
9.8%
SOXQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

OMFL
9.5%
SOXQ

-

Consumer Defensive

OMFL
8.8%
SOXQ

-

Energy

OMFL
3.7%
SOXQ

-

Basic Materials

OMFL
2.5%
SOXQ

-

Real Estate

OMFL
0.8%
SOXQ

-

Utilities

OMFL
0.4%
SOXQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OMFL vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMFL
OMFL Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
OMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
OMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXQ
SOXQ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SOXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMFL vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OMFLSOXQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.72

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

11.73

-8.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.12

45.01

-31.90

OMFL vs. SOXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the SOXQ Sharpe Ratio of 5.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMFL and SOXQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OMFLSOXQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

5.43

-3.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.98

-0.28

Drawdowns

OMFL vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMFL drawdown since its inception was -33.24%, smaller than the maximum SOXQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFL and SOXQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OMFLSOXQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.24%

-46.01%

+12.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-15.59%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.52%

-39.36%

+23.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

0.00%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-12.96%

+8.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

4.06%

-2.38%

Volatility

OMFL vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) is 2.40%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that OMFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OMFLSOXQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

13.44%

-11.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

26.70%

-17.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.03%

33.78%

-21.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.75%

36.38%

-19.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.11%

36.38%

-16.27%

OMFL vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMFL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

OMFL vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison

OMFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
OMFL
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
0.75%0.80%1.22%1.37%1.55%0.95%1.48%1.53%1.39%0.32%
SOXQ
Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF
0.26%0.50%0.68%0.87%1.36%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OMFL and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to OMFL (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMFL dropped -33.24% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.

On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 14.35% for OMFL. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, OMFL has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 14.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for OMFL.

OMFL has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.

OMFL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. OMFL tracks Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for OMFL and 0.19% for SOXQ.

SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OMFL and SOXQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer