PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OMF vs. UBER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OMF vs. UBER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMF achieves a -12.84% return, which is significantly higher than UBER's -15.74% return.


OMF

1D
-0.02%
1M
5.96%
YTD
-12.84%
6M
-14.45%
1Y
17.69%
3Y*
18.04%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
17.73%

UBER

1D
-1.01%
1M
-8.31%
YTD
-15.74%
6M
-19.10%
1Y
-17.97%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMF vs. UBER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
OMF
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
-12.84%39.77%15.14%63.03%-27.20%23.56%34.53%34.92%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
-15.74%35.46%-2.03%148.97%-41.02%-17.78%71.49%-29.19%

Correlation

The correlation between OMF and UBER is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019

0.37

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OMF:

$6.65B

UBER:

$142.62B

EPS

OMF:

$6.71

UBER:

$4.05

PE Ratio

OMF:

8.45

UBER:

16.98

PS Ratio

OMF:

1.36

UBER:

2.70

PB Ratio

OMF:

1.97

UBER:

5.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

OMF:

$4.94B

UBER:

$53.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OMF:

$2.20B

UBER:

$22.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

OMF:

$943.00M

UBER:

$5.85B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OMF vs. UBER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMF
OMF Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
OMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMF Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

UBER
UBER Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
UBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBER Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
UBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBER Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMF vs. UBER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OMFUBERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.92

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

-0.62

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.12

-1.09

+2.22

OMF vs. UBER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMF Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the UBER Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMF and UBER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OMF vs. UBER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMF drawdown since its inception was -68.66%, roughly equal to the maximum UBER drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMF and UBER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OMFUBERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.66%

-68.05%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.68%

-31.46%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.94%

-31.46%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.93%

-60.45%

+12.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.50%

-31.22%

+13.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.29%

-25.67%

+1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.25%

17.93%

-4.68%

Volatility

OMF vs. UBER - Volatility Comparison

OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) has a higher volatility of 8.84% compared to Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) at 7.96%. This indicates that OMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OMFUBERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.84%

7.96%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.61%

23.21%

-1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.07%

32.66%

-3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.65%

44.82%

-9.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.05%

50.61%

-4.56%

Dividends

OMF vs. UBER - Dividend Comparison

OMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, while UBER has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
OMF
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
7.39%6.17%7.90%8.13%11.41%19.08%12.33%7.12%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

OMF vs. UBER - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OneMain Holdings, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
197.00M
13.20B
(OMF) Total Revenue
(UBER) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


OMF and UBER have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OMF has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to UBER (7.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMF dropped -68.66% vs UBER's -68.05%.

OMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OMF and UBER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer