PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OMF vs. LMP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OMF vs. LMP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) and LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

OMF is traded in USD, while LMP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LMP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMF achieves a -4.17% return, which is significantly lower than LMP.L's 1.86% return. Over the past 10 years, OMF has outperformed LMP.L with an annualized return of 19.71%, while LMP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.29% annualized return.


OMF

1D
3.16%
1M
12.73%
YTD
-4.17%
6M
-5.66%
1Y
18.48%
3Y*
22.17%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
19.71%

LMP.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.86%
6M
2.26%
1Y
-4.31%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
0.55%
10Y*
7.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMF vs. LMP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OMF
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
-4.17%39.77%15.14%63.03%-27.20%23.56%34.53%88.37%-6.54%17.39%
LMP.L
LondonMetric Property plc
1.86%20.96%-2.09%23.40%-43.33%27.16%3.62%47.25%-7.83%37.21%

Correlation

The correlation between OMF and LMP.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2015

0.22

The correlation between OMF and LMP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OMF:

$7.31B

LMP.L:

£4.42B

EPS

OMF:

$6.73

LMP.L:

£0.28

PE Ratio

OMF:

9.27

LMP.L:

6.70

PS Ratio

OMF:

1.49

LMP.L:

4.97

PB Ratio

OMF:

2.17

LMP.L:

0.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

OMF:

$4.94B

LMP.L:

£867.40M

Gross Profit (TTM)

OMF:

$2.20B

LMP.L:

£854.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

OMF:

$943.00M

LMP.L:

£828.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OMF vs. LMP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMF
OMF Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
OMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMF Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
OMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMF Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

LMP.L
LMP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
LMP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
LMP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMF vs. LMP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) and LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OMFLMP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.98

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

-0.26

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

-0.46

+1.82

OMF vs. LMP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMF Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the LMP.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMF and LMP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OMF vs. LMP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMF drawdown since its inception was -68.66%, which is greater than LMP.L's maximum drawdown of -53.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMF and LMP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OMFLMP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.66%

-53.28%

-15.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.68%

-16.83%

-12.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.94%

-22.97%

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.93%

-53.28%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.66%

-53.28%

-15.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.30%

-15.96%

+6.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.25%

-13.57%

-10.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.57%

9.43%

+4.14%

Volatility

OMF vs. LMP.L - Volatility Comparison

OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) has a higher volatility of 8.55% compared to LondonMetric Property plc (LMP.L) at 6.36%. This indicates that OMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OMFLMP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.55%

6.36%

+2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.59%

16.00%

+5.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.08%

19.92%

+9.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.59%

27.67%

+7.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.86%

26.86%

+19.00%

Dividends

OMF vs. LMP.L - Dividend Comparison

OMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, more than LMP.L's 6.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMP.L
LondonMetric Property plc
6.56%6.54%6.16%5.07%5.48%3.12%3.71%3.55%4.60%4.09%4.73%3.35%
OMF
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
6.72%6.17%7.90%8.13%11.41%19.08%12.33%7.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

OMF vs. LMP.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OneMain Holdings, Inc. and LondonMetric Property plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
197.00M
238.90M
(OMF) Total Revenue
(LMP.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. OMF values in USD, LMP.L values in GBP

Frequently Asked Questions


OMF and LMP.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OMF and LMP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer