PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OMF vs. BOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OMF vs. BOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMF achieves a -17.91% return, which is significantly lower than BOAT's 29.73% return.


OMF

1D
-2.04%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
-17.91%
6M
-14.41%
1Y
9.62%
3Y*
18.66%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
14.95%

BOAT

1D
-0.83%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
29.73%
6M
28.77%
1Y
49.09%
3Y*
27.56%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMF vs. BOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
OMF
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
-17.91%39.77%15.14%63.03%-27.20%-11.00%
BOAT
SonicShares Global Shipping ETF
29.73%22.77%5.97%24.53%6.26%23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between OMF and BOAT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OMF vs. BOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMF
OMF Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
OMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMF Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
OMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMF Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

BOAT
BOAT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMF vs. BOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OMFBOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.41

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

4.25

-3.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.75

13.13

-12.38

OMF vs. BOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMF Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the BOAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMF and BOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OMFBOATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

2.50

-2.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.93

-0.74

Drawdowns

OMF vs. BOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMF drawdown since its inception was -68.66%, which is greater than BOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMF and BOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OMFBOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.66%

-33.94%

-34.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.68%

-11.60%

-18.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.94%

-33.94%

+4.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.30%

-6.70%

-15.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.31%

-9.70%

-14.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.86%

3.75%

+9.11%

Volatility

OMF vs. BOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) is 6.88%, while SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that OMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OMFBOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.88%

7.60%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.12%

15.34%

+5.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.48%

19.77%

+8.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.53%

25.12%

+10.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.08%

25.12%

+20.96%

Dividends

OMF vs. BOAT - Dividend Comparison

OMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.84%, more than BOAT's 6.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BOAT
SonicShares Global Shipping ETF
6.32%8.08%13.89%13.65%13.57%1.36%0.00%0.00%
OMF
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
7.84%6.17%7.90%8.13%11.41%19.08%12.33%7.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


OMF and BOAT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOAT has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to OMF (6.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMF dropped -68.66% vs BOAT's -33.94%.

BOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OMF and BOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer