PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OMAB vs. PRU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OMAB vs. PRU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. (OMAB) and Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMAB achieves a -8.34% return, which is significantly lower than PRU's -5.60% return. Over the past 10 years, OMAB has outperformed PRU with an annualized return of 12.38%, while PRU has yielded a comparatively lower 8.31% annualized return.


OMAB

1D
-0.13%
1M
-7.47%
YTD
-8.34%
6M
-1.54%
1Y
-2.16%
3Y*
9.62%
5Y*
21.13%
10Y*
12.38%

PRU

1D
-0.86%
1M
4.29%
YTD
-5.60%
6M
-4.28%
1Y
3.57%
3Y*
12.48%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
8.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMAB vs. PRU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OMAB
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.
-8.34%66.22%-13.57%43.53%30.18%7.98%-13.78%62.40%-4.90%20.53%
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
-5.60%0.18%19.46%10.09%-3.86%45.32%-11.40%20.10%-26.46%13.65%

Correlation

The correlation between OMAB and PRU is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2006

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between OMAB and PRU has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OMAB:

$4.68B

PRU:

$36.24B

EPS

OMAB:

$109.59

PRU:

$9.85

PE Ratio

OMAB:

0.88

PRU:

10.53

PEG Ratio

OMAB:

0.05

PRU:

0.44

PS Ratio

OMAB:

0.29

PRU:

0.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

OMAB:

$16.21B

PRU:

$47.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OMAB:

$12.07B

PRU:

$14.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

OMAB:

$9.83B

PRU:

$4.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OMAB vs. PRU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMAB
OMAB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
OMAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMAB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
OMAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMAB Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

PRU
PRU Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PRU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRU Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PRU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRU Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMAB vs. PRU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. (OMAB) and Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OMABPRUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.05

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

0.17

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.19

0.36

-0.55

OMAB vs. PRU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMAB Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the PRU Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMAB and PRU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OMABPRUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

0.16

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.18

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.26

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.21

+0.16

Drawdowns

OMAB vs. PRU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMAB drawdown since its inception was -77.75%, smaller than the maximum PRU drawdown of -88.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMAB and PRU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OMABPRUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.75%

-88.53%

+10.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.14%

-21.46%

-4.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.78%

-25.66%

-16.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.78%

-33.11%

-8.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.88%

-65.89%

-2.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.14%

-13.45%

-12.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.70%

-18.32%

-4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.40%

9.84%

+1.56%

Volatility

OMAB vs. PRU - Volatility Comparison

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. (OMAB) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) at 5.88%. This indicates that OMAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OMABPRUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.83%

5.88%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.36%

17.55%

+4.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.51%

22.61%

+6.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.75%

25.83%

+9.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.29%

31.84%

+6.45%

Dividends

OMAB vs. PRU - Dividend Comparison

OMAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, more than PRU's 5.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OMAB
Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.
5.61%4.52%6.97%4.80%10.87%3.55%0.00%2.45%3.74%0.40%3.11%3.89%
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
5.30%4.78%4.39%4.82%4.83%4.25%5.64%4.27%4.41%2.61%2.69%3.00%

Financials

OMAB vs. PRU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. and Prudential Financial, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
3.82B
0
(OMAB) Total Revenue
(PRU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


OMAB and PRU have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OMAB has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to PRU (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMAB dropped -77.75% vs PRU's -88.53%.

PRU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OMAB and PRU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer