PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OLN vs. UA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OLN vs. UA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Olin Corporation (OLN) and Under Armour, Inc. (UA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with OLN having a 22.46% return and UA slightly higher at 22.50%. Over the past 10 years, OLN has outperformed UA with an annualized return of 3.32%, while UA has yielded a comparatively lower -16.19% annualized return.


OLN

1D
3.84%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
22.46%
6M
15.01%
1Y
27.48%
3Y*
-19.68%
5Y*
-10.59%
10Y*
3.32%

UA

1D
0.86%
1M
17.84%
YTD
22.50%
6M
41.35%
1Y
-4.85%
3Y*
-5.28%
5Y*
-20.46%
10Y*
-16.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OLN vs. UA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OLN
Olin Corporation
22.46%-36.15%-36.29%3.46%-6.63%138.55%50.81%-10.77%-41.88%42.51%
UA
Under Armour, Inc.
22.50%-35.66%-10.66%-6.39%-50.55%21.24%-22.42%18.61%21.40%-47.08%

Correlation

The correlation between OLN and UA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2016

0.37

The correlation between OLN and UA shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OLN:

$2.86B

UA:

$2.50B

EPS

OLN:

-$1.11

UA:

-$1.16

PS Ratio

OLN:

0.43

UA:

0.51

PB Ratio

OLN:

1.65

UA:

1.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

OLN:

$6.72B

UA:

$4.97B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OLN:

$352.80M

UA:

$2.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

OLN:

$374.70M

UA:

-$86.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OLN vs. UA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OLN
OLN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
OLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
OLN Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
OLN Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

UA
UA Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
UA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
UA Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
UA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
UA Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OLN vs. UA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Olin Corporation (OLN) and Under Armour, Inc. (UA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OLNUADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.02

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

-0.20

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.73

-0.33

+2.06

OLN vs. UA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OLN Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is higher than the UA Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OLN and UA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OLN vs. UA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OLN drawdown since its inception was -73.80%, smaller than the maximum UA drawdown of -91.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OLN and UA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OLNUADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.80%

-91.34%

+17.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.45%

-42.86%

+11.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.26%

-60.16%

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.87%

-82.50%

+10.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.80%

-89.92%

+16.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.94%

-87.14%

+28.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.97%

-69.19%

+44.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.58%

26.26%

-12.68%

Volatility

OLN vs. UA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Olin Corporation (OLN) is 9.59%, while Under Armour, Inc. (UA) has a volatility of 11.83%. This indicates that OLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OLNUADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.59%

11.83%

-2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.93%

43.31%

-4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.61%

53.90%

+1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.90%

50.27%

-5.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.12%

50.37%

-3.25%

Dividends

OLN vs. UA - Dividend Comparison

OLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, while UA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OLN
Olin Corporation
3.18%3.84%2.37%1.48%1.51%1.39%3.26%4.64%3.98%2.25%3.12%4.63%
UA
Under Armour, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

OLN vs. UA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Olin Corporation and Under Armour, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.58B
1.15B
(OLN) Total Revenue
(UA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

OLN vs. UA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Olin Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
40.3%
Portfolio components
OLN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olin Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

UA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a gross profit of 465.14M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.

OLN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olin Corporation reported an operating income of -78.30M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in an operating margin of -5.0%.

UA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported an operating income of -33.70M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.

OLN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olin Corporation reported a net income of -83.00M and revenue of 1.58B, resulting in a net margin of -5.2%.

UA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a net income of -43.39M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OLN and UA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UA has higher volatility (11.83%) compared to OLN (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OLN dropped -73.80% vs UA's -91.34%.

OLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OLN and UA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer