OKTG vs. GII
OKTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF) and GII (SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OKTG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while GII is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure. OKTG is actively managed, while GII is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. OKTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GII.
Performance
OKTG vs. GII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OKTG achieves a 40.39% return, which is significantly higher than GII's 9.90% return.
OKTG
- 1D
- 4.16%
- 1M
- 48.25%
- YTD
- 40.39%
- 6M
- 31.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GII
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 9.22%
- 1Y
- 17.15%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.74%
OKTG vs. GII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OKTG Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF | 40.39% | 5.90% |
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 9.90% | 0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between OKTG and GII is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OKTG vs. GII — Risk / Return Rank
OKTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GII
OKTG vs. GII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF (OKTG) and SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OKTG | GII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OKTG vs. GII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OKTG drawdown since its inception was -60.69%, which is greater than GII's maximum drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OKTG and GII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OKTG | GII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.69% | -50.98% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.62% | -2.64% | -27.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.17% | -11.49% | -12.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.09% | — |
Volatility
OKTG vs. GII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OKTG | GII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 133.51% | 10.86% | +122.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 133.51% | 14.09% | +119.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 133.51% | 17.07% | +116.44% |
OKTG vs. GII - Expense Ratio Comparison
OKTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GII's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
OKTG vs. GII - Dividend Comparison
OKTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.66% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 3.70% | 3.07% | 2.37% | 2.66% | 3.39% | 3.31% | 3.38% | 3.11% | 3.54% |
OKTG Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OKTG and GII have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GII is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GII is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for OKTG.
GII has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.00% for OKTG.
OKTG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GII is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for OKTG and 0.40% for GII.
Find the right allocation for OKTG and GII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer