PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OILU vs. BSMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OILU vs. BSMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILU achieves a 56.19% return, which is significantly higher than BSMW's 1.50% return.


OILU

1D
1.41%
1M
-13.64%
6M
41.67%
YTD
56.19%
1Y
45.51%
3Y*
-1.79%
5Y*
10Y*

BSMW

1D
0.14%
1M
0.20%
6M
0.78%
YTD
1.50%
1Y
5.89%
3Y*
3.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OILU vs. BSMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
OILU
MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN
56.19%-16.50%-21.65%-16.61%
BSMW
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF
1.50%3.42%-0.35%7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between OILU and BSMW is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2023

-0.12

The correlation between OILU and BSMW shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (1 year) to -0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OILU vs. BSMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILU
OILU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
OILU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILU Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
OILU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILU Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

BSMW
BSMW Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BSMW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMW Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMW Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILU vs. BSMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OILUBSMWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.44

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

1.98

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.71

6.03

-3.32

OILU vs. BSMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILU Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the BSMW Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILU and BSMW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OILU vs. BSMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILU drawdown since its inception was -81.00%, which is greater than BSMW's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILU and BSMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OILUBSMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.00%

-7.57%

-73.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.49%

-2.92%

-43.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.09%

-7.34%

-61.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.99%

-0.79%

-57.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.68%

-1.70%

-48.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.82%

0.95%

+16.87%

Volatility

OILU vs. BSMW - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) has a higher volatility of 21.48% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) at 0.44%. This indicates that OILU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OILUBSMWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.48%

0.44%

+21.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.14%

1.92%

+49.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.46%

2.64%

+60.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.95%

4.93%

+76.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.95%

4.93%

+76.02%

OILU vs. BSMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

OILU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMW's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

OILU vs. BSMW - Dividend Comparison

OILU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OILU and BSMW have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILU has higher volatility (21.48%) compared to BSMW (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILU dropped -81.00% vs BSMW's -7.57%.

On 3-year performance, BSMW leads with 3.04% vs -1.79% for OILU. On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BSMW has performed better with a 3.04% return vs -1.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OILU.

BSMW has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 0.00% for OILU.

OILU is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while BSMW is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OILU and 0.18% for BSMW.

BSMW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OILU and BSMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer