OILT vs. LNGX
OILT (Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF) and LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - OILT tracks the Alerian Texas Weighted Oil and Gas Index - Benchmark TR Gross while LNGX tracks the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OILT charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LNGX.
Performance
OILT vs. LNGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILT achieves a 35.33% return, which is significantly higher than LNGX's 20.47% return.
OILT
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- 35.33%
- 6M
- 29.79%
- 1Y
- 47.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LNGX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -6.84%
- YTD
- 20.47%
- 6M
- 13.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILT vs. LNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OILT Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF | 35.33% | 5.98% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 20.47% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILT and LNGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILT vs. LNGX — Risk / Return Rank
OILT
LNGX
OILT vs. LNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OILT | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OILT | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 2.10 | -1.68 |
Drawdowns
OILT vs. LNGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILT drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than LNGX's maximum drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILT and LNGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILT | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -14.31% | -20.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.67% | -11.36% | +2.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.93% | -4.37% | -8.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.66% | — | — |
Volatility
OILT vs. LNGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILT | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.09% | 24.67% | +3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 24.67% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 24.67% | +4.05% |
OILT vs. LNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OILT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LNGX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
OILT vs. LNGX - Dividend Comparison
OILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than LNGX's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
OILT Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF | 2.43% | 3.12% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OILT and LNGX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OILT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OILT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LNGX.
OILT has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 0.22% for LNGX.
OILT tracks Alerian Texas Weighted Oil and Gas Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while LNGX tracks Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for OILT and 0.45% for LNGX.
Find the right allocation for OILT and LNGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer