PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OILT vs. BILD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OILT vs. BILD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT) and Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILT achieves a 35.33% return, which is significantly higher than BILD's 7.24% return.


OILT

1D
1.74%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
35.33%
6M
29.79%
1Y
47.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BILD

1D
-0.50%
1M
-2.00%
YTD
7.24%
6M
6.70%
1Y
14.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OILT vs. BILD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
OILT
Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF
35.33%-3.30%0.87%-0.16%
BILD
Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF
7.24%21.08%-2.68%0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between OILT and BILD is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2023

0.12

OILT vs. BILD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OILT
BILD

Energy

94.2%
18.4%

Utilities

5.8%
54.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

20.4%

Real Estate

-

5.5%

Technology

-

-

Energy

OILT
94.2%
BILD
18.4%

Utilities

OILT
5.8%
BILD
54.2%

Basic Materials

OILT

-

BILD

-

Communication Services

OILT

-

BILD
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

OILT

-

BILD

-

Consumer Defensive

OILT

-

BILD

-

Financial Services

OILT

-

BILD

-

Healthcare

OILT

-

BILD

-

Industrials

OILT

-

BILD
20.4%

Real Estate

OILT

-

BILD
5.5%

Technology

OILT

-

BILD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OILT vs. BILD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILT
OILT Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
OILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILT Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
OILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILT Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BILD
BILD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILD Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILT vs. BILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT) and Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OILTBILDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.24

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

2.41

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.37

6.80

+1.58

OILT vs. BILD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILT Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the BILD Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILT and BILD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OILTBILDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.35

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.88

-0.46

Drawdowns

OILT vs. BILD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILT drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than BILD's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILT and BILD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OILTBILDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-14.78%

-20.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.79%

-6.05%

-7.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.67%

-5.05%

-3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-3.70%

-9.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.66%

2.14%

+3.52%

Volatility

OILT vs. BILD - Volatility Comparison

Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT) has a higher volatility of 9.94% compared to Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) at 4.05%. This indicates that OILT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OILTBILDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.94%

4.05%

+5.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.13%

8.88%

+12.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.09%

10.78%

+17.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.72%

13.23%

+15.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.72%

13.23%

+15.49%

OILT vs. BILD - Expense Ratio Comparison

OILT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BILD's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

OILT vs. BILD - Dividend Comparison

OILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, less than BILD's 2.86% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BILD
Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF
2.86%3.05%5.53%0.52%
OILT
Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF
2.43%3.12%2.63%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OILT and BILD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILT has higher volatility (9.94%) compared to BILD (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILT dropped -35.21% vs BILD's -14.78%.

On 1-year performance, OILT leads with 47.26% vs 14.53% for BILD. On fees, OILT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BILD has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OILT has performed better with a 47.26% return vs 14.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OILT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BILD.

BILD has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 2.43% for OILT.

They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and Macquarie. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for OILT and 0.49% for BILD.

OILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OILT and BILD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer