OILK vs. SCO
OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) and SCO (ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both Oil & Gas funds from ProShares - OILK tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index while SCO tracks the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OILK returned 13.00%/yr vs -38.03%/yr for SCO. At a correlation of -0.99, they often move in opposite directions. OILK charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SCO.
Performance
OILK vs. SCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILK achieves a 40.78% return, which is significantly higher than SCO's -57.74% return.
OILK
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -13.38%
- YTD
- 40.78%
- 6M
- 38.63%
- 1Y
- 27.24%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.00%
- 10Y*
- —
SCO
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 30.31%
- YTD
- -57.74%
- 6M
- -56.56%
- 1Y
- -50.02%
- 3Y*
- -32.22%
- 5Y*
- -38.03%
- 10Y*
- -37.10%
OILK vs. SCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 40.78% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 2.82% |
SCO ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | -57.74% | 15.90% | -19.00% | -12.41% | -62.59% | -72.62% | -4.20% | -58.50% | 19.22% | -22.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILK and SCO is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2016 | -0.99 |
The correlation between OILK and SCO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILK vs. SCO — Risk / Return Rank
OILK
SCO
OILK vs. SCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) and ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OILK | SCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.86 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | -0.69 | +2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.49 | -1.35 | +4.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OILK vs. SCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILK drawdown since its inception was -83.76%, smaller than the maximum SCO drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILK and SCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILK | SCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.76% | -99.80% | +16.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.41% | -72.24% | +54.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.42% | -78.76% | +55.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.69% | -94.80% | +60.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.41% | -99.72% | +82.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.48% | -85.20% | +52.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.86% | 37.01% | -29.15% |
Volatility
OILK vs. SCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) is 8.02%, while ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) has a volatility of 15.93%. This indicates that OILK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILK | SCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | 15.93% | -7.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.07% | 47.12% | -23.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.00% | 57.11% | -28.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.27% | 60.04% | -29.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.96% | 71.88% | -35.92% |
OILK vs. SCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
OILK has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than SCO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
OILK vs. SCO - Dividend Comparison
OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.54%, while SCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 9.54% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
SCO ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OILK and SCO have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCO has higher volatility (15.93%) compared to OILK (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILK dropped -83.76% vs SCO's -99.80%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 13.00% vs -38.03% for SCO. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, OILK has been the lower-risk option at 8.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 13.00% return vs -38.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCO.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 9.54%, compared with 0.00% for SCO.
OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index, while SCO tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%). Their fees differ too: 0.68% for OILK and 0.95% for SCO.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OILK and SCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer