OILK vs. BITU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index, while BITU is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, OILK returned 27.24% vs -74.19% for BITU. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OILK charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITU.

Performance

OILK vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILK achieves a 40.78% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -58.07% return.

OILK

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -13.38%
• YTD: 40.78%
• 6M: 38.63%
• 1Y: 27.24%
• 3Y*: 13.91%
• 5Y*: 13.00%
• 10Y*: —

BITU

• 1D: -6.41%
• 1M: -34.27%
• YTD: -58.07%
• 6M: -58.34%
• 1Y: -74.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OILK vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	40.78%	-11.86%	-5.76%
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	-58.07%	-37.07%	41.85%

Correlation

The correlation between OILK and BITU is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	0.03

Return for Risk

OILK vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILK

OILK Risk / Return Rank: 28
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 27
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 27

BITU

BITU Risk / Return Rank: 2
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILK vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OILK	BITU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	-0.84	+1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	-1.46	+2.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.84	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	-0.90	+2.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.49	-1.40	+4.89

OILK vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILK Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILK and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OILK vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILK drawdown since its inception was -83.76%, roughly equal to the maximum BITU drawdown of -82.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILK and BITU.

Drawdown Indicators

	OILK	BITU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.76%	-82.21%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.41%	-82.21%	+64.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.41%	-81.25%	+63.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.48%	-35.50%	+3.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.86%	53.05%	-45.19%

Volatility

OILK vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) is 8.02%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 26.20%. This indicates that OILK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OILK	BITU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.02%	26.20%	-18.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.07%	69.81%	-45.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.00%	88.13%	-59.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.27%	97.37%	-67.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.96%	97.37%	-61.41%

OILK vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

OILK has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

OILK vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.54%, less than BITU's 93.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	93.59%	50.23%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	9.54%	4.79%	3.11%	5.80%	17.32%	68.82%	0.13%	0.94%	0.58%	6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OILK and BITU in my portfolio?

OILK and BITU have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OILK or BITU?

BITU has higher volatility (26.20%) compared to OILK (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILK dropped -83.76% vs BITU's -82.21%.

Which ETF is better, OILK or BITU?

On 1-year performance, OILK leads with 27.24% vs -74.19% for BITU. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, OILK has been the lower-risk option at 8.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OILK or BITU?

Over the 1-year period, OILK has performed better with a 27.24% return vs -74.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OILK or BITU?

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OILK or BITU?

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 93.59%, compared with 9.54% for OILK.

What is the main difference between OILK and BITU?

OILK is categorized as Oil & Gas, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index, while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for OILK and 0.95% for BITU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.