OILD vs. WTIU
OILD (MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - OILD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%), while WTIU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OILD returned -44.47%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for WTIU. At a correlation of -0.97, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
OILD vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILD achieves a -57.86% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 68.22% return.
OILD
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -7.04%
- 6M
- -47.85%
- YTD
- -57.86%
- 1Y
- -65.56%
- 3Y*
- -44.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTIU
- 1D
- -2.99%
- 1M
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 43.17%
- YTD
- 68.22%
- 1Y
- 60.48%
- 3Y*
- 1.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILD vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -57.86% | -41.67% | -14.58% | -9.05% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 68.22% | -17.13% | -29.63% | -28.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILD and WTIU is -0.97, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2023 | -0.97 |
The correlation between OILD and WTIU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.97 to -0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
OILD vs. WTIU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OILD
WTIU
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
OILD
WTIU
Basic Materials
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Communication Services
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Consumer Cyclical
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Consumer Defensive
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Financial Services
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Healthcare
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Industrials
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Real Estate
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Technology
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Utilities
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILD vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
OILD
WTIU
OILD vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OILD | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.18 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 1.26 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 2.97 | -4.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OILD vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILD drawdown since its inception was -98.90%, which is greater than WTIU's maximum drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILD and WTIU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILD | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.90% | -75.73% | -23.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.53% | -48.11% | -26.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.29% | -75.73% | -10.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.63% | -40.37% | -58.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.80% | -39.32% | -49.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.08% | 20.42% | +26.66% |
Volatility
OILD vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) is 22.10%, while MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a volatility of 23.30%. This indicates that OILD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILD | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.10% | 23.30% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.10% | 57.05% | -6.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.18% | 69.37% | -6.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.25% | 70.90% | +8.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.25% | 70.90% | +8.35% |
OILD vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OILD and WTIU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
OILD vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
Neither OILD nor WTIU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
OILD and WTIU have a correlation of -0.97, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTIU has higher volatility (23.30%) compared to OILD (22.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILD dropped -98.90% vs WTIU's -75.73%.
On 3-year performance, WTIU leads with 1.22% vs -44.47% for OILD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, OILD has been the lower-risk option at 22.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, WTIU has performed better with a 1.22% return vs -44.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILD and WTIU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
OILD and WTIU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
OILD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while WTIU is Leveraged Equities. OILD tracks Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%), while WTIU tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%).
WTIU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OILD and WTIU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer