OILD vs. WTIU
OILD (MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - OILD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%), while WTIU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OILD returned -44.01%/yr vs -1.81%/yr for WTIU. At a correlation of -0.97, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
OILD vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILD achieves a -51.09% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 43.70% return.
OILD
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- 20.25%
- YTD
- -51.09%
- 6M
- -52.16%
- 1Y
- -62.90%
- 3Y*
- -44.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTIU
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -18.32%
- YTD
- 43.70%
- 6M
- 46.65%
- 1Y
- 45.61%
- 3Y*
- -1.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILD vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -51.09% | -41.67% | -14.58% | -9.05% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 43.70% | -17.13% | -29.63% | -28.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILD and WTIU is -0.97, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2023 | -0.97 |
The correlation between OILD and WTIU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.97 to -0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
OILD vs. WTIU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OILD
WTIU
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
OILD
WTIU
Basic Materials
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Communication Services
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Consumer Cyclical
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Consumer Defensive
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Financial Services
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Healthcare
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Industrials
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Real Estate
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Technology
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Utilities
OILD
-
WTIU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILD vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
OILD
WTIU
OILD vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OILD | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.15 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 0.97 | -1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | 2.51 | -3.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OILD vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILD drawdown since its inception was -98.90%, which is greater than WTIU's maximum drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILD and WTIU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILD | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.90% | -75.73% | -23.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.53% | -47.07% | -27.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.76% | -75.73% | -12.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.41% | -49.06% | -49.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.69% | -39.21% | -49.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.80% | 18.25% | +26.55% |
Volatility
OILD vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) is 21.07%, while MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a volatility of 22.57%. This indicates that OILD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILD | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.07% | 22.57% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.80% | 56.28% | -6.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.31% | 68.30% | -5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.36% | 70.77% | +8.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.36% | 70.77% | +8.59% |
OILD vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OILD and WTIU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
OILD vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
Neither OILD nor WTIU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
OILD and WTIU have a correlation of -0.97, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTIU has higher volatility (22.57%) compared to OILD (21.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILD dropped -98.90% vs WTIU's -75.73%.
On 3-year performance, WTIU leads with -1.81% vs -44.01% for OILD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, OILD has been the lower-risk option at 21.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, WTIU has performed better with a -1.81% return vs -44.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILD and WTIU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
OILD and WTIU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
OILD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while WTIU is Leveraged Equities. OILD tracks Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%), while WTIU tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%).
WTIU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OILD and WTIU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer