OILD vs. SARK
OILD (MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. OILD is passively managed, while SARK is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, OILD returned -44.01%/yr vs -30.40%/yr for SARK. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OILD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SARK.
Performance
OILD vs. SARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OILD achieves a -51.09% return, which is significantly lower than SARK's -5.95% return.
OILD
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- 20.25%
- YTD
- -51.09%
- 6M
- -52.16%
- 1Y
- -62.90%
- 3Y*
- -44.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SARK
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- -5.95%
- 6M
- -1.42%
- 1Y
- -18.93%
- 3Y*
- -30.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILD vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -51.09% | -41.67% | -14.58% | -19.58% | -90.32% | 3.83% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -5.95% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -46.32% | 83.35% | 24.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between OILD and SARK is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021 | 0.15 |
The correlation between OILD and SARK shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OILD vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank
OILD
SARK
OILD vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OILD | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.94 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | -0.71 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | -1.19 | -0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OILD vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OILD drawdown since its inception was -98.90%, which is greater than SARK's maximum drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILD and SARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OILD | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.90% | -81.07% | -17.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.53% | -26.61% | -47.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.76% | -74.42% | -13.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.41% | -79.24% | -19.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.69% | -46.85% | -41.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.80% | 15.90% | +28.90% |
Volatility
OILD vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) has a higher volatility of 21.07% compared to Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) at 12.52%. This indicates that OILD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OILD | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.07% | 12.52% | +8.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.80% | 26.52% | +23.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.31% | 35.74% | +26.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.36% | 56.10% | +23.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.36% | 56.10% | +23.26% |
OILD vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
OILD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
OILD vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison
OILD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.00% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OILD and SARK have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILD has higher volatility (21.07%) compared to SARK (12.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILD dropped -98.90% vs SARK's -81.07%.
On 3-year performance, SARK leads with -30.40% vs -44.01% for OILD. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SARK has been the lower-risk option at 12.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SARK has performed better with a -30.40% return vs -44.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OILD.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 0.00% for OILD.
They also come from different issuers: REX and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OILD and 0.75% for SARK.
SARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.53 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OILD and SARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer