OILD vs. METD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

OILD (MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. OILD is passively managed, while METD is actively managed. Over the past year, OILD returned -73.93% vs 3.51% for METD. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. OILD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for METD.

Performance

OILD vs. METD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILD achieves a -61.34% return, which is significantly lower than METD's 0.85% return.

OILD

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 3.58%
• YTD: -61.34%
• 6M: -58.10%
• 1Y: -73.93%
• 3Y*: -48.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

METD

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: -3.88%
• YTD: 0.85%
• 6M: 1.38%
• 1Y: 3.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OILD vs. METD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-61.34%	-41.67%	8.47%
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	0.85%	-17.33%	-15.84%

Correlation

The correlation between OILD and METD is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024	-0.03

The correlation between OILD and METD shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

OILD vs. METD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILD

OILD Risk / Return Rank: 1
OILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
OILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
OILD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
OILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
OILD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

METD

METD Risk / Return Rank: 11
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 12
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILD vs. METD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OILD	METD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.22	0.10	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.57	0.39	-2.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	1.05	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.96	0.14	-1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.58	0.33	-1.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OILD vs. METD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILD Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is lower than the METD Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILD and METD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OILD	METD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.22	0.10	-1.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.75	-0.45	-0.30

Drawdowns

OILD vs. METD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILD drawdown since its inception was -98.90%, which is greater than METD's maximum drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILD and METD.

Drawdown Indicators

	OILD	METD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.90%	-46.03%	-52.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.40%	-24.38%	-53.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-88.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.74%	-35.18%	-63.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.65%	-28.62%	-60.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.83%	10.79%	+36.04%

Volatility

OILD vs. METD - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD) has a higher volatility of 24.24% compared to Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) at 8.80%. This indicates that OILD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OILD	METD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.24%	8.80%	+15.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.36%	27.01%	+21.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.04%	35.58%	+25.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	79.35%	36.38%	+42.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	79.35%	36.38%	+42.97%

OILD vs. METD - Expense Ratio Comparison

OILD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than METD's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

OILD vs. METD - Dividend Comparison

OILD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	2.71%	3.35%	2.30%
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OILD and METD in my portfolio?

OILD and METD have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OILD or METD?

OILD has higher volatility (24.24%) compared to METD (8.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILD dropped -98.90% vs METD's -46.03%.

Which ETF is better, OILD or METD?

On 1-year performance, METD leads with 3.51% vs -73.93% for OILD. On fees, OILD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, METD has been the lower-risk option at 8.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OILD or METD?

Over the 1-year period, METD has performed better with a 3.51% return vs -73.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OILD or METD?

OILD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for METD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OILD or METD?

METD has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.00% for OILD.

What is the main difference between OILD and METD?

They also come from different issuers: REX and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OILD and 1.00% for METD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

METD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.