PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OIH vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OIH vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OIH achieves a 51.43% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, OIH has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of -0.90%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.


OIH

1D
0.18%
1M
-2.77%
YTD
51.43%
6M
43.87%
1Y
92.96%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
13.62%
10Y*
-0.90%

GDX

1D
-3.46%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
5.62%
1Y
61.27%
3Y*
41.00%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OIH vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OIH
VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF
51.43%6.81%-10.53%3.20%66.17%21.22%-41.19%-3.54%-45.03%-19.66%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-0.90%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between OIH and GDX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2006

0.31

The correlation between OIH and GDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OIH vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OIH
GDX

Energy

98.0%

-

Utilities

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

OIH
98.0%
GDX

-

Utilities

OIH
1.8%
GDX

-

Basic Materials

OIH

-

GDX
100.0%

Communication Services

OIH

-

GDX

-

Consumer Cyclical

OIH

-

GDX

-

Consumer Defensive

OIH

-

GDX

-

Financial Services

OIH

-

GDX

-

Healthcare

OIH

-

GDX

-

Industrials

OIH

-

GDX

-

Real Estate

OIH

-

GDX

-

Technology

OIH

-

GDX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OIH vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OIH
OIH Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
OIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
OIH Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
OIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
OIH Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OIH vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OIHGDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.19

1.35

+1.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.87

1.76

+2.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.25

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.80

2.00

+7.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.42

5.13

+19.30

OIH vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OIH Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OIH and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OIHGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

1.35

+1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.52

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

0.38

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.13

-0.12

Drawdowns

OIH vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OIH drawdown since its inception was -94.45%, which is greater than GDX's maximum drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OIH and GDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OIHGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.45%

-80.34%

-14.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-30.84%

+21.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.80%

-30.84%

-12.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.80%

-46.51%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.62%

-49.79%

-39.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.60%

-26.62%

-34.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.84%

-40.43%

-8.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

11.99%

-8.17%

Volatility

OIH vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) is 7.95%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 15.40%. This indicates that OIH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OIHGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

15.40%

-7.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.36%

37.50%

-17.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.49%

45.49%

-16.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.79%

36.39%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.41%

37.18%

+5.23%

OIH vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OIH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

OIH vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

OIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than GDX's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.74%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
OIH
VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF
1.13%1.71%2.01%1.36%0.95%0.98%1.23%2.10%2.13%2.60%1.40%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


OIH and GDX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to OIH (7.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OIH dropped -94.45% vs GDX's -80.34%.

On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.98% vs -0.90% for OIH. On fees, OIH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, OIH has been the lower-risk option at 7.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.98% return vs -0.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OIH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.

OIH has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.

OIH is categorized as Energy Equities, while GDX is Gold. OIH tracks MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for OIH and 0.51% for GDX.

OIH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OIH and GDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer