PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
OIH vs. BILD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

OIH vs. BILD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OIH (VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF) and BILD (Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. OIH is passively managed, while BILD is actively managed. Over the past year, OIH returned 92.96% vs 14.71% for BILD. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OIH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for BILD.

Performance

OIH vs. BILD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) and Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OIH achieves a 51.43% return, which is significantly higher than BILD's 7.77% return.

OIH

1D
0.18%
1M
-2.77%
YTD
51.43%
6M
43.87%
1Y
92.96%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
13.62%
10Y*
-0.90%

BILD

1D
0.95%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
7.77%
6M
7.29%
1Y
14.71%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OIH vs. BILD - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
OIH
VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF		51.43%6.81%-10.53%1.01%
BILD
Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF		7.77%21.08%-2.68%3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between OIH and BILD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023

0.22

OIH vs. BILD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
OIH
BILD

Energy

98.0%
18.4%

Utilities

1.8%
54.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

20.4%

Real Estate

-

5.5%

Technology

-

-

Energy

OIH
98.0%
BILD
18.4%

Utilities

OIH
1.8%
BILD
54.2%

Basic Materials

OIH

-

BILD

-

Communication Services

OIH

-

BILD
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

OIH

-

BILD

-

Consumer Defensive

OIH

-

BILD

-

Financial Services

OIH

-

BILD

-

Healthcare

OIH

-

BILD

-

Industrials

OIH

-

BILD
20.4%

Real Estate

OIH

-

BILD
5.5%

Technology

OIH

-

BILD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF

Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF

Often compared with OIH:
OIH vs. XLEOIH vs. XOPOIH vs. XESOIH vs. IXCOIH vs. IYEOIH vs. BZ=FOIH vs. DIG
Often compared with BILD:
BILD vs. BKGIBILD vs. EFRABILD vs. IGFBILD vs. KTOSBILD vs. AIRRBILD vs. LNGXBILD vs. STAX

Return for Risk

OIH vs. BILD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
OIH
OIH Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
OIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
OIH Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
OIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
OIH Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
BILD
BILD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BILD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BILD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILD Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OIH vs. BILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) and Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

OIHBILDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.19

1.37

+1.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.87

1.88

+1.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.25

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.80

2.57

+7.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.42

7.31

+17.11

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OIH vs. BILD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OIH Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the BILD Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OIH and BILD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

OIHBILDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

1.37

+1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.89

-0.89

Drawdowns

OIH vs. BILD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OIH drawdown since its inception was -94.45%, which is greater than BILD's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OIH and BILD.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

OIHBILDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.45%

-14.78%

-79.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-6.05%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.80%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.80%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.62%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.60%

-4.58%

-57.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.84%

-3.70%

-45.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

2.12%

+1.70%

Volatility

OIH vs. BILD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH) has a higher volatility of 7.95% compared to Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF (BILD) at 4.13%. This indicates that OIH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

OIHBILDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.95%

4.13%

+3.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.36%

8.91%

+11.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.49%

10.78%

+18.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.79%

13.23%

+23.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.41%

13.23%

+29.18%

OIH vs. BILD - Expense Ratio Comparison

OIH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BILD's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

OIH vs. BILD - Dividend Comparison

OIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than BILD's 2.85% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BILD
Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF		2.85%3.05%5.53%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OIH
VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF		1.13%1.71%2.01%1.36%0.95%0.98%1.23%2.10%2.13%2.60%1.40%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

OIH and BILD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OIH has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to BILD (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OIH dropped -94.45% vs BILD's -14.78%.

On 1-year performance, OIH leads with 92.96% vs 14.71% for BILD. On fees, OIH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BILD has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OIH has performed better with a 92.96% return vs 14.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OIH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for BILD.

BILD has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 1.13% for OIH.

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Macquarie. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for OIH and 0.49% for BILD.

OIH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OIH and BILD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer