PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OGIG vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OGIG vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OGIG achieves a -18.24% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 30.53% return.


OGIG

1D
-0.32%
1M
-5.75%
YTD
-18.24%
6M
-19.41%
1Y
-16.68%
3Y*
11.17%
5Y*
-5.48%
10Y*

FMTM

1D
-3.43%
1M
4.31%
YTD
30.53%
6M
28.10%
1Y
61.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OGIG vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OGIG and FMTM is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OGIG vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OGIG
OGIG Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
OGIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OGIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
OGIG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
OGIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
OGIG Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OGIG vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OGIGFMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.42

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

5.06

-5.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.00

19.29

-20.29

OGIG vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OGIG Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OGIG and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OGIG vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OGIG drawdown since its inception was -66.05%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OGIG and FMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OGIGFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.05%

-12.12%

-53.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.23%

-12.12%

-21.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.46%

-3.43%

-29.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.68%

-1.91%

-23.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.69%

3.17%

+13.52%

Volatility

OGIG vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

O’Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) have volatilities of 9.72% and 9.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OGIGFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.72%

9.38%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.95%

19.05%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.82%

24.27%

-1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.68%

23.68%

+8.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.00%

23.68%

+7.32%

OGIG vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

OGIG has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

OGIG vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

OGIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than FMTM's 0.23% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


OGIG and FMTM have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OGIG has higher volatility (9.72%) compared to FMTM (9.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OGIG dropped -66.05% vs FMTM's -12.12%.

On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 61.05% vs -16.68% for OGIG. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FMTM has been the lower-risk option at 9.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 61.05% return vs -16.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OGIG.

FMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.23%, compared with 0.09% for OGIG.

OGIG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OGIG and 0.45% for FMTM.

FMTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OGIG and FMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer