OGC.TO vs. FTT.TO
OGC.TO (OceanaGold Corporation) and FTT.TO (Finning International Inc.) are both stocks. OGC.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while FTT.TO operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, OGC.TO returned 11.30%/yr vs 19.54%/yr for FTT.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OGC.TO vs. FTT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OGC.TO achieves a -5.23% return, which is significantly lower than FTT.TO's 30.45% return. Over the past 10 years, OGC.TO has underperformed FTT.TO with an annualized return of 11.30%, while FTT.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.54% annualized return.
OGC.TO
- 1D
- 4.21%
- 1M
- -14.60%
- YTD
- -5.23%
- 6M
- -3.32%
- 1Y
- 75.60%
- 3Y*
- 63.49%
- 5Y*
- 36.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
FTT.TO
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 30.45%
- 6M
- 29.08%
- 1Y
- 78.99%
- 3Y*
- 38.08%
- 5Y*
- 27.84%
- 10Y*
- 19.54%
OGC.TO vs. FTT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OGC.TO OceanaGold Corporation | -5.23% | 227.48% | 57.16% | -1.22% | 17.27% | -10.57% | -3.53% | -48.74% | 54.71% | -17.19% |
FTT.TO Finning International Inc. | 30.45% | 99.50% | 2.20% | 16.93% | 8.70% | 21.09% | 11.28% | 10.09% | -22.99% | 24.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between OGC.TO and FTT.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2007 | 0.12 |
Over the past year, OGC.TO and FTT.TO have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
OGC.TO:
CA$8.31B
FTT.TO:
CA$12.64B
OGC.TO:
$1.61
FTT.TO:
CA$5.11
OGC.TO:
16.31
FTT.TO:
18.86
OGC.TO:
0.04
FTT.TO:
1.26
OGC.TO:
5.51
FTT.TO:
1.20
OGC.TO:
2.48
FTT.TO:
4.39
OGC.TO:
$2.25B
FTT.TO:
CA$10.64B
OGC.TO:
$1.24B
FTT.TO:
CA$2.44B
OGC.TO:
$1.22B
FTT.TO:
CA$1.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OGC.TO vs. FTT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
OGC.TO
FTT.TO
OGC.TO vs. FTT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO) and Finning International Inc. (FTT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OGC.TO | FTT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.40 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 4.50 | -2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.37 | 15.26 | -9.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OGC.TO vs. FTT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OGC.TO drawdown since its inception was -96.53%, which is greater than FTT.TO's maximum drawdown of -68.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OGC.TO and FTT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OGC.TO | FTT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.53% | -68.67% | -27.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.13% | -17.67% | -24.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.13% | -24.50% | -17.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.87% | -39.10% | -7.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.07% | -65.63% | -12.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.68% | -10.81% | -25.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.06% | -19.55% | -20.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.94% | 5.20% | +9.74% |
Volatility
OGC.TO vs. FTT.TO - Volatility Comparison
OceanaGold Corporation (OGC.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.43% compared to Finning International Inc. (FTT.TO) at 13.80%. This indicates that OGC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OGC.TO | FTT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.43% | 13.80% | +4.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.15% | 28.31% | +12.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.21% | 35.48% | +15.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.75% | 32.59% | +17.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.63% | 31.83% | +20.80% |
Dividends
OGC.TO vs. FTT.TO - Dividend Comparison
OGC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than FTT.TO's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTT.TO Finning International Inc. | 1.28% | 1.59% | 2.82% | 2.57% | 2.77% | 2.70% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 3.32% | 2.35% | 2.78% | 3.88% |
OGC.TO OceanaGold Corporation | 0.90% | 0.29% | 0.23% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.63% |
Financials
OGC.TO vs. FTT.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OceanaGold Corporation and Finning International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OGC.TO vs. FTT.TO - Profitability Comparison
OGC.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported a gross profit of 397.08M and revenue of 702.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.5%.
FTT.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Finning International Inc. reported a gross profit of 586.00M and revenue of 2.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.
OGC.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported an operating income of 330.79M and revenue of 702.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.1%.
FTT.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Finning International Inc. reported an operating income of 187.00M and revenue of 2.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.
OGC.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OceanaGold Corporation reported a net income of 224.66M and revenue of 702.79M, resulting in a net margin of 32.0%.
FTT.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Finning International Inc. reported a net income of 121.00M and revenue of 2.50B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OGC.TO and FTT.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for OGC.TO and FTT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer