FTT.TO vs. HMM-A.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Finning International Inc. (FTT.TO) and Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited (HMM-A.TO).
Performance
FTT.TO vs. HMM-A.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTT.TO vs. HMM-A.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTT.TO Finning International Inc. | 16.12% | 99.50% | 2.20% | 16.93% | 8.70% | 21.09% | 11.28% | 10.09% | -22.99% | 24.04% |
HMM-A.TO Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited | -8.84% | 7.58% | 28.83% | 100.52% | 14.89% | 73.02% | 14.68% | -0.54% | -8.60% | 14.22% |
Fundamentals
FTT.TO:
CA$11.25B
HMM-A.TO:
CA$115.50M
FTT.TO:
CA$4.97
HMM-A.TO:
CA$1.27
FTT.TO:
17.32
HMM-A.TO:
8.02
FTT.TO:
1.16
HMM-A.TO:
0.36
FTT.TO:
1.08
HMM-A.TO:
0.41
FTT.TO:
4.03
HMM-A.TO:
0.88
FTT.TO:
CA$10.59B
HMM-A.TO:
CA$281.41M
FTT.TO:
CA$2.44B
HMM-A.TO:
CA$94.59M
FTT.TO:
CA$1.24B
HMM-A.TO:
CA$32.40M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTT.TO achieves a 16.12% return, which is significantly higher than HMM-A.TO's -8.84% return. Over the past 10 years, FTT.TO has outperformed HMM-A.TO with an annualized return of 19.60%, while HMM-A.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 17.37% annualized return.
FTT.TO
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -6.39%
- YTD
- 16.12%
- 6M
- 34.12%
- 1Y
- 116.59%
- 3Y*
- 40.06%
- 5Y*
- 24.66%
- 10Y*
- 19.60%
HMM-A.TO
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -9.57%
- YTD
- -8.84%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 21.32%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 25.29%
- 10Y*
- 17.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTT.TO vs. HMM-A.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FTT.TO
HMM-A.TO
FTT.TO vs. HMM-A.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Finning International Inc. (FTT.TO) and Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited (HMM-A.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTT.TO | HMM-A.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.15 | 0.66 | +2.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.77 | 1.10 | +2.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.14 | +0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.71 | 1.11 | +5.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.12 | 2.42 | +20.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTT.TO | HMM-A.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.15 | 0.66 | +2.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.73 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.43 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.08 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTT.TO and HMM-A.TO is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FTT.TO vs. HMM-A.TO - Dividend Comparison
FTT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than HMM-A.TO's 0.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTT.TO Finning International Inc. | 1.41% | 1.59% | 2.82% | 2.57% | 2.77% | 2.70% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 3.32% | 2.35% | 2.78% | 3.89% |
HMM-A.TO Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited | 0.59% | 0.54% | 0.57% | 0.73% | 1.46% | 1.10% | 1.88% | 2.11% | 2.05% | 0.92% | 1.04% | 0.98% |
Drawdowns
FTT.TO vs. HMM-A.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTT.TO drawdown since its inception was -68.67%, smaller than the maximum HMM-A.TO drawdown of -90.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTT.TO and HMM-A.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTT.TO | HMM-A.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.67% | -90.37% | +21.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.67% | -17.77% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.10% | -44.68% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.63% | -59.85% | -5.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.13% | -25.77% | +13.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.24% | -44.68% | +27.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.12% | 8.18% | -3.06% |
Volatility
FTT.TO vs. HMM-A.TO - Volatility Comparison
Finning International Inc. (FTT.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.46% compared to Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited (HMM-A.TO) at 6.65%. This indicates that FTT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMM-A.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTT.TO | HMM-A.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.46% | 6.65% | +6.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.55% | 20.65% | +3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.22% | 32.28% | +4.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.76% | 34.86% | -3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.54% | 40.45% | -8.91% |
Financials
FTT.TO vs. HMM-A.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Finning International Inc. and Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FTT.TO vs. HMM-A.TO - Profitability Comparison
FTT.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Finning International Inc. reported a gross profit of 617.00M and revenue of 2.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.9%.
HMM-A.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited reported a gross profit of 22.11M and revenue of 72.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.7%.
FTT.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Finning International Inc. reported an operating income of 204.00M and revenue of 2.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.
HMM-A.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited reported an operating income of 3.31M and revenue of 72.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.
FTT.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Finning International Inc. reported a net income of 115.00M and revenue of 2.69B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
HMM-A.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hammond Manufacturing Company Limited reported a net income of 1.92M and revenue of 72.13M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.