OEFA vs. DBE
OEFA (ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - OEFA is a International Equity fund tracking the O’Shares International Developed Quality Dividend Index, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.42, they often move in opposite directions. OEFA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.
Performance
OEFA vs. DBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OEFA achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 48.87% return.
OEFA
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBE
- 1D
- -3.31%
- 1M
- -19.00%
- YTD
- 48.87%
- 6M
- 46.64%
- 1Y
- 44.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
OEFA vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OEFA ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF | 2.69% | 0.73% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 48.87% | -4.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between OEFA and DBE is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | -0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OEFA vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank
OEFA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DBE
OEFA vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF (OEFA) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OEFA | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.86 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OEFA vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OEFA drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEFA and DBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OEFA | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.54% | -86.69% | +73.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -43.48% | +39.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -57.24% | +53.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.57% | — |
Volatility
OEFA vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OEFA | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.65% | 34.90% | -17.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 29.62% | -11.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 28.36% | -10.71% |
OEFA vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
OEFA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
OEFA vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison
OEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than DBE's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.60% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% |
OEFA ALPS O'Shares International Developed Quality Dividend ETF | 1.45% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OEFA and DBE have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OEFA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OEFA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.
DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.45% for OEFA.
OEFA is categorized as International Equity, while DBE is Oil & Gas. OEFA tracks O’Shares International Developed Quality Dividend Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: ALPS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OEFA and 0.78% for DBE.
Find the right allocation for OEFA and DBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer