OEF vs. SPTM
OEF (iShares S&P 100 ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - OEF tracks the S&P 100 Index while SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, OEF returned 16.63%/yr vs 15.36%/yr for SPTM. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
OEF vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OEF achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 8.72% return. Over the past 10 years, OEF has outperformed SPTM with an annualized return of 16.63%, while SPTM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.36% annualized return.
OEF
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- 5.60%
- 6M
- 4.83%
- 1Y
- 23.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.31%
- 5Y*
- 14.45%
- 10Y*
- 16.63%
SPTM
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 7.68%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.72%
- 10Y*
- 15.36%
OEF vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 5.60% | 19.80% | 30.74% | 32.71% | -21.03% | 29.18% | 21.21% | 31.87% | -4.16% | 21.82% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 8.72% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | -17.75% | 28.58% | 17.94% | 31.34% | -5.30% | 21.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between OEF and SPTM is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2000 | 0.92 |
The correlation between OEF and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OEF vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
OEF
SPTM
OEF vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OEF | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.35 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 2.77 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | 12.49 | -3.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OEF vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OEF drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, roughly equal to the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEF and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OEF | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.11% | -54.80% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -8.68% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.80% | -18.87% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.47% | -24.14% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.44% | -34.66% | +3.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.48% | -2.80% | -1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.74% | -9.03% | -2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 1.92% | +0.81% |
Volatility
OEF vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) at 4.79%. This indicates that OEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OEF | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.27% | 4.79% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.57% | 9.82% | +0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.42% | 12.51% | +0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 16.96% | +0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 18.04% | +0.44% |
OEF vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
OEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
OEF vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
OEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than SPTM's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 0.89% | 0.81% | 1.03% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 1.43% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 1.81% | 2.07% | 2.11% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.08% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, OEF and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
OEF has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to SPTM (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEF dropped -54.11% vs SPTM's -54.80%.
On 10-year performance, OEF leads with 16.63% vs 15.36% for SPTM. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, OEF has performed better with a 16.63% return vs 15.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for OEF.
SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.89% for OEF.
OEF tracks S&P 100 Index, while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for OEF and 0.03% for SPTM.
SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OEF and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer