OEF vs. RFDA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OEF (iShares S&P 100 ETF) and RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. OEF is passively managed, while RFDA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, OEF returned 15.70%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for RFDA. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RFDA.

Performance

OEF vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OEF achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than RFDA's 11.40% return.

OEF

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 5.44%
• YTD: 9.51%
• 6M: 9.34%
• 1Y: 29.54%
• 3Y*: 24.53%
• 5Y*: 15.70%
• 10Y*: 16.71%

RFDA

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 11.40%
• 6M: 12.25%
• 1Y: 29.49%
• 3Y*: 19.19%
• 5Y*: 13.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OEF vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF	9.51%	19.80%	30.74%	32.71%	-21.03%	29.18%	21.21%	31.87%	-4.16%	21.82%
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	11.40%	16.42%	20.12%	16.98%	-8.58%	25.94%	11.26%	27.15%	-9.27%	19.86%

Correlation

The correlation between OEF and RFDA is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2016	0.87

The correlation between OEF and RFDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

OEF vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OEF	RFDA
Technology	41.0%	19.9%
Communication Services	14.5%	8.8%
Financial Services	10.7%	14.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	7.0%
Healthcare	8.3%	8.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	7.6%
Industrials	5.3%	8.9%
Energy	2.6%	12.5%
Utilities	0.9%	5.0%
Basic Materials	0.5%	1.8%
Real Estate	0.3%	5.0%

Return for Risk

OEF vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OEF

OEF Risk / Return Rank: 64
OEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
OEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
OEF Omega Ratio Rank: 68
OEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
OEF Martin Ratio Rank: 62

RFDA

RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 83
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 79
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OEF vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OEF	RFDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.55	-0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	3.52	-0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.47	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	5.44	-2.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.29	19.87	-8.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OEF vs. RFDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the RFDA Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OEF and RFDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OEF	RFDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	2.55	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.84	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.79	-0.35

Drawdowns

OEF vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OEF drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, which is greater than RFDA's maximum drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEF and RFDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	OEF	RFDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.11%	-34.60%	-19.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.06%	-5.45%	-5.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.80%	-19.35%	-0.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.47%	-19.35%	-7.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.94%	-0.92%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.76%	-3.74%	-8.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.62%	1.49%	+1.13%

Volatility

OEF vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) at 2.66%. This indicates that OEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OEF	RFDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.14%	2.66%	+0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.48%	8.47%	+1.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.73%	11.64%	+1.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.69%	15.73%	+1.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.44%	16.85%	+1.59%

OEF vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

OEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

OEF vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison

OEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than RFDA's 1.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF	0.83%	0.81%	1.03%	1.19%	1.55%	1.06%	1.43%	1.87%	2.09%	1.81%	2.07%	2.11%
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	1.77%	1.89%	2.23%	2.68%	3.57%	1.44%	1.62%	1.87%	2.44%	1.90%	0.98%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OEF and RFDA in my portfolio?

OEF and RFDA have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OEF or RFDA?

OEF has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to RFDA (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEF dropped -54.11% vs RFDA's -34.60%.

Which ETF is better, OEF or RFDA?

On 5-year performance, OEF leads with 15.70% vs 13.17% for RFDA. On fees, OEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OEF or RFDA?

Over the 5-year period, OEF has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 13.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OEF or RFDA?

OEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OEF or RFDA?

RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.83% for OEF.

What is the main difference between OEF and RFDA?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for OEF and 0.52% for RFDA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.