OEF vs. HLAL
OEF (iShares S&P 100 ETF) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - OEF tracks the S&P 100 Index while HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OEF returned 15.70%/yr vs 15.86%/yr for HLAL. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HLAL.
Performance
OEF vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OEF achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 18.72% return.
OEF
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- 1Y
- 29.54%
- 3Y*
- 24.53%
- 5Y*
- 15.70%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
HLAL
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 17.75%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.04%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- —
OEF vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 9.51% | 19.80% | 30.74% | 32.71% | -21.03% | 29.18% | 21.21% | 9.44% |
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 18.72% | 18.30% | 16.70% | 30.13% | -17.56% | 28.64% | 24.65% | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between OEF and HLAL is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between OEF and HLAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
OEF vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OEF
HLAL
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
OEF
HLAL
Communication Services
OEF
HLAL
Financial Services
OEF
HLAL
Consumer Cyclical
OEF
HLAL
Healthcare
OEF
HLAL
Consumer Defensive
OEF
HLAL
Industrials
OEF
HLAL
Energy
OEF
HLAL
Utilities
OEF
HLAL
Basic Materials
OEF
HLAL
Real Estate
OEF
HLAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OEF vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank
OEF
HLAL
OEF vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OEF | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.33 | 3.33 | -0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.15 | 4.62 | -1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.59 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 4.30 | -1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.29 | 19.85 | -8.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OEF | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 3.33 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.91 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.89 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
OEF vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OEF drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, which is greater than HLAL's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEF and HLAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OEF | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.11% | -33.57% | -20.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -10.20% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.80% | -21.67% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.47% | -23.18% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -0.07% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.76% | -5.00% | -6.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 2.20% | +0.42% |
Volatility
OEF vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) is 3.14%, while Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that OEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OEF | HLAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 3.70% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 9.95% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 13.17% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 17.60% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 20.21% | -1.77% |
OEF vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
OEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
OEF vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison
OEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than HLAL's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF | 0.44% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 1.15% | 0.78% | 0.97% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 0.83% | 0.81% | 1.03% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 1.43% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 1.81% | 2.07% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, OEF and HLAL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HLAL has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to OEF (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEF dropped -54.11% vs HLAL's -33.57%.
On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 15.86% vs 15.70% for OEF. On fees, OEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, OEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 15.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.
OEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.44% for HLAL.
OEF tracks S&P 100 Index, while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for OEF and 0.50% for HLAL.
HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OEF and HLAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer