OCTZ vs. KSEP
OCTZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF) and KSEP (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OCTZ returned 20.60% vs 20.63% for KSEP. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
OCTZ vs. KSEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OCTZ achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly lower than KSEP's 8.77% return.
OCTZ
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 4.25%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 20.60%
- 3Y*
- 16.44%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- —
KSEP
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 20.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCTZ vs. KSEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OCTZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF | 8.27% | 12.89% | 5.10% |
KSEP Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September | 8.77% | 8.54% | 3.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between OCTZ and KSEP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024 | 0.78 |
The correlation between OCTZ and KSEP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCTZ vs. KSEP — Risk / Return Rank
OCTZ
KSEP
OCTZ vs. KSEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OCTZ | KSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.37 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 4.36 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.00 | 15.77 | -3.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OCTZ | KSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 2.04 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 1.03 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
OCTZ vs. KSEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCTZ drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, which is greater than KSEP's maximum drawdown of -14.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTZ and KSEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCTZ | KSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -14.92% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.31% | -4.75% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -0.28% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.16% | -2.45% | -0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 1.31% | +0.41% |
Volatility
OCTZ vs. KSEP - Volatility Comparison
TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP) at 1.63%. This indicates that OCTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KSEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCTZ | KSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 1.63% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.26% | 6.27% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.39% | 10.16% | -0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.40% | 11.65% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.37% | 11.65% | +0.72% |
OCTZ vs. KSEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both OCTZ and KSEP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
OCTZ vs. KSEP - Dividend Comparison
OCTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, while KSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KSEP Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OCTZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF | 3.69% | 3.99% | 1.26% | 3.28% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OCTZ and KSEP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OCTZ has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to KSEP (1.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTZ dropped -15.82% vs KSEP's -14.92%.
On 1-year performance, KSEP leads with 20.63% vs 20.60% for OCTZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, KSEP has been the lower-risk option at 1.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KSEP has performed better with a 20.63% return vs 20.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OCTZ and KSEP have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
OCTZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 0.00% for KSEP.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Innovator.
OCTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OCTZ and KSEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer