OCTZ vs. DBE
OCTZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - OCTZ is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by TrueShares, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. OCTZ is actively managed, while DBE is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OCTZ returned 11.17%/yr vs 19.05%/yr for DBE. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OCTZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.
Performance
OCTZ vs. DBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OCTZ achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 79.04% return.
OCTZ
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 8.61%
- 6M
- 8.59%
- 1Y
- 21.02%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- —
DBE
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -6.01%
- YTD
- 79.04%
- 6M
- 69.31%
- 1Y
- 81.31%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 19.05%
- 10Y*
- 11.58%
OCTZ vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCTZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF | 8.61% | 12.89% | 18.89% | 18.18% | -10.23% | 20.49% | 8.53% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 79.04% | -2.17% | 2.96% | -12.14% | 33.77% | 57.56% | 16.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between OCTZ and DBE is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2020 | 0.10 |
The correlation between OCTZ and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCTZ vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank
OCTZ
DBE
OCTZ vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OCTZ | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.39 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 5.67 | -2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 11.08 | +1.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OCTZ | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.33 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.65 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.09 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
OCTZ vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCTZ drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTZ and DBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCTZ | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -86.69% | +70.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.31% | -14.41% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | -23.89% | +9.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.82% | -38.74% | +22.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -32.03% | +31.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.16% | -57.30% | +54.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 7.37% | -5.65% |
Volatility
OCTZ vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) is 2.42%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 13.05%. This indicates that OCTZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCTZ | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 13.05% | -10.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.26% | 30.97% | -23.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.39% | 35.07% | -25.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.39% | 29.41% | -17.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.37% | 28.34% | -15.97% |
OCTZ vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
OCTZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
OCTZ vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison
OCTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than DBE's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.16% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% |
OCTZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF | 3.68% | 3.99% | 1.26% | 3.28% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OCTZ and DBE have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBE has higher volatility (13.05%) compared to OCTZ (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCTZ dropped -15.82% vs DBE's -86.69%.
On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 19.05% vs 11.17% for OCTZ. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, OCTZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 19.05% return vs 11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OCTZ.
OCTZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 2.16% for DBE.
OCTZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for OCTZ and 0.78% for DBE.
DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OCTZ and DBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer