PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCTZ vs. BAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OCTZ vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OCTZ vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
OCTZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF
-3.41%12.89%18.89%18.18%-10.23%20.49%8.53%
BAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April
2.08%8.28%15.95%23.16%-7.04%12.58%3.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCTZ achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 2.08% return.


OCTZ

1D
2.03%
1M
-3.58%
YTD
-3.41%
6M
-1.67%
1Y
12.51%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*

BAPR

1D
2.58%
1M
0.99%
YTD
2.08%
6M
4.42%
1Y
15.33%
3Y*
13.43%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OCTZ vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both OCTZ and BAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

OCTZ vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCTZ
OCTZ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
OCTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
OCTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

BAPR
BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCTZ vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OCTZBAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

1.29

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

1.99

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.40

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.74

-0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.21

11.59

-5.38

OCTZ vs. BAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCTZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the BAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCTZ and BAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCTZBAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

1.29

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.88

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.75

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between OCTZ and BAPR is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

OCTZ vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

OCTZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, while BAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
OCTZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF
4.13%3.99%1.26%3.28%0.67%
BAPR
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

OCTZ vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCTZ drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCTZ and BAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OCTZBAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-23.91%

+8.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.09%

-9.19%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.82%

-15.58%

-0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.43%

0.00%

-5.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-2.66%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.38%

+0.68%

Volatility

OCTZ vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (October) ETF (OCTZ) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) at 3.45%. This indicates that OCTZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OCTZBAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

3.45%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

4.26%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.64%

11.90%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.41%

11.54%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.45%

13.25%

-0.80%