PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUGZ vs. SEPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUGZ vs. SEPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AUGZ having a 7.08% return and SEPZ slightly higher at 7.26%.


AUGZ

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.08%
YTD
7.08%
6M
6.74%
1Y
19.59%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
10.53%
10Y*

SEPZ

1D
-0.40%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
7.26%
6M
7.09%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
15.61%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUGZ vs. SEPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AUGZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF
7.08%13.49%17.99%17.32%-10.41%20.74%6.14%
SEPZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF
7.26%13.18%18.23%17.94%-8.51%21.83%5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between AUGZ and SEPZ is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2020

0.98

The correlation between AUGZ and SEPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUGZ vs. SEPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUGZ
AUGZ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AUGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
AUGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SEPZ
SEPZ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SEPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SEPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUGZ vs. SEPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AUGZSEPZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.74

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.29

11.88

-0.60

AUGZ vs. SEPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUGZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the SEPZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUGZ and SEPZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AUGZ vs. SEPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUGZ drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, roughly equal to the maximum SEPZ drawdown of -15.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGZ and SEPZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUGZSEPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-15.22%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-7.30%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-14.57%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.67%

-15.22%

-0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-1.72%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-2.83%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.68%

+0.06%

Volatility

AUGZ vs. SEPZ - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF (SEPZ) have volatilities of 3.84% and 3.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUGZSEPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.92%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.95%

8.00%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.02%

10.48%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.05%

12.38%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.14%

12.49%

-0.35%

AUGZ vs. SEPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUGZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SEPZ's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUGZ vs. SEPZ - Dividend Comparison

AUGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than SEPZ's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AUGZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF
3.39%3.63%4.08%3.42%0.41%0.00%
SEPZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF
2.05%2.20%3.62%3.55%0.69%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, AUGZ and SEPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SEPZ has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to AUGZ (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUGZ dropped -15.67% vs SEPZ's -15.22%.

On 5-year performance, SEPZ leads with 11.30% vs 10.53% for AUGZ. On fees, AUGZ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SEPZ has performed better with a 11.30% return vs 10.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AUGZ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SEPZ.

AUGZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 2.05% for SEPZ.

AUGZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SEPZ is Options Trading. AUGZ tracks S&P 500 Index, while SEPZ tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index September. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for AUGZ and 0.80% for SEPZ.

AUGZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUGZ and SEPZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer