AUGZ vs. BSJP
AUGZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF) and BSJP (Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AUGZ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while BSJP is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. AUGZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJP.
Performance
AUGZ vs. BSJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AUGZ
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 7.11%
- 1Y
- 15.39%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.79%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.49%
BSJP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $28.12K | $49.05K | $654.57K |
AUGZ vs. BSJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUGZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF | 7.11% | 13.49% | 17.99% | 17.32% | -10.41% | 20.74% | 11.22% |
BSJP Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 4.46% | 8.07% | 10.41% | -5.16% | 4.57% | 5.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUGZ and BSJP is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020 | 0.59 |
The correlation between AUGZ and BSJP shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUGZ vs. BSJP — Risk / Return Rank
AUGZ
BSJP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AUGZ vs. BSJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ) and Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AUGZ | BSJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.17 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AUGZ vs. BSJP - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUGZ | BSJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | — | — |
Volatility
AUGZ vs. BSJP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUGZ | BSJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.58% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.10% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.13% | — | — |
AUGZ vs. BSJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUGZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJP's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUGZ vs. BSJP - Dividend Comparison
AUGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than BSJP's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUGZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF | 3.39% | 3.63% | 4.08% | 3.42% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BSJP Invesco BulletShares 2025 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.52% | 4.50% | 6.25% | 7.07% | 5.37% | 4.27% | 4.96% | 5.49% | 5.84% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AUGZ and BSJP have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSJP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSJP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for AUGZ.
AUGZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.39%, compared with 1.52% for BSJP.
AUGZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BSJP is High Yield Bonds. AUGZ tracks S&P 500 Index, while BSJP tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2025 TR Index. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for AUGZ and 0.42% for BSJP.
Find the right allocation for AUGZ and BSJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer