PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OCMAX vs. RYPMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OCMAX vs. RYPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OCM Gold Atlas (OCMAX) and Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCMAX achieves a 8.66% return, which is significantly higher than RYPMX's 7.46% return. Over the past 10 years, OCMAX has outperformed RYPMX with an annualized return of 18.34%, while RYPMX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.77% annualized return.


OCMAX

1D
0.81%
1M
4.43%
YTD
8.66%
6M
18.70%
1Y
72.79%
3Y*
52.72%
5Y*
21.66%
10Y*
18.34%

RYPMX

1D
1.28%
1M
5.36%
YTD
7.46%
6M
14.86%
1Y
80.72%
3Y*
43.06%
5Y*
17.92%
10Y*
14.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OCMAX vs. RYPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OCMAX
OCM Gold Atlas
8.66%168.37%23.87%4.82%-17.28%-9.16%45.45%58.42%-13.25%10.55%
RYPMX
Rydex Precious Metals Fund
7.46%148.94%10.14%4.24%-10.57%-8.96%34.25%52.91%-16.56%7.04%

Correlation

The correlation between OCMAX and RYPMX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2010

0.96

The correlation between OCMAX and RYPMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OCMAX vs. RYPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OCMAX
OCMAX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
OCMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
OCMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

RYPMX
RYPMX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
RYPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
RYPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OCMAX vs. RYPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OCM Gold Atlas (OCMAX) and Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OCMAXRYPMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

1.77

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.28

2.11

+0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.30

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

2.61

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.65

6.87

+0.78

OCMAX vs. RYPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the RYPMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCMAX and RYPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OCMAXRYPMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.77

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.49

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.40

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.08

+0.16

Drawdowns

OCMAX vs. RYPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCMAX drawdown since its inception was -76.26%, smaller than the maximum RYPMX drawdown of -81.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCMAX and RYPMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OCMAXRYPMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.26%

-81.25%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.33%

-30.86%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.33%

-30.86%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.14%

-46.46%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.14%

-47.81%

+2.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.22%

-22.11%

+4.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.15%

-40.37%

+4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.71%

11.71%

-2.00%

Volatility

OCMAX vs. RYPMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OCM Gold Atlas (OCMAX) is 13.66%, while Rydex Precious Metals Fund (RYPMX) has a volatility of 15.04%. This indicates that OCMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OCMAXRYPMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.66%

15.04%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.51%

37.48%

-5.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.75%

45.86%

-7.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.32%

36.93%

-2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.70%

37.03%

-3.33%

OCMAX vs. RYPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCMAX has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than RYPMX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

OCMAX vs. RYPMX - Dividend Comparison

OCMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than RYPMX's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OCMAX
OCM Gold Atlas
5.44%5.91%2.97%0.00%0.04%0.95%1.44%5.66%24.55%6.72%18.48%0.05%
RYPMX
Rydex Precious Metals Fund
2.80%3.01%0.00%3.51%7.15%6.39%1.06%2.08%1.35%5.53%4.04%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, OCMAX and RYPMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RYPMX has higher volatility (15.04%) compared to OCMAX (13.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCMAX dropped -76.26% vs RYPMX's -81.25%.

OCMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OCMAX and RYPMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer