OCMAX vs. CEF
Compare and contrast key facts about OCM Gold Atlas (OCMAX) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF).
OCMAX is an actively managed fund by OCM. It was launched on Mar 31, 2010. CEF is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018.
Performance
OCMAX vs. CEF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OCMAX vs. CEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCMAX OCM Gold Atlas | 0.41% | 168.37% | 23.87% | 4.82% | -17.28% | -9.16% | 45.45% | 58.42% | -13.25% | 10.55% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 4.19% | 92.76% | 24.07% | 6.80% | 1.07% | -8.32% | 31.99% | 16.91% | -6.34% | 18.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OCMAX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than CEF's 4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, OCMAX has outperformed CEF with an annualized return of 19.69%, while CEF has yielded a comparatively lower 15.03% annualized return.
OCMAX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -23.39%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 19.80%
- 1Y
- 95.92%
- 3Y*
- 46.20%
- 5Y*
- 24.64%
- 10Y*
- 19.69%
CEF
- 1D
- 5.58%
- 1M
- -15.38%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- 30.06%
- 1Y
- 67.97%
- 3Y*
- 36.15%
- 5Y*
- 21.95%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OCMAX vs. CEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
OCMAX has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than CEF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OCMAX vs. CEF — Risk / Return Rank
OCMAX
CEF
OCMAX vs. CEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OCM Gold Atlas (OCMAX) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OCMAX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 1.83 | +0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.72 | 2.12 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.34 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 2.61 | +0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.90 | 9.68 | +3.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OCMAX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 1.83 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.93 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.70 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between OCMAX and CEF is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OCMAX vs. CEF - Dividend Comparison
OCMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, while CEF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCMAX OCM Gold Atlas | 5.89% | 5.91% | 2.97% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 5.66% | 24.55% | 6.72% | 18.48% | 0.05% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
Drawdowns
OCMAX vs. CEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCMAX drawdown since its inception was -76.26%, which is greater than CEF's maximum drawdown of -62.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCMAX and CEF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCMAX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.26% | -62.29% | -13.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.33% | -26.77% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.14% | -26.77% | -18.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.14% | -29.10% | -16.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.51% | -19.41% | -4.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.37% | -27.38% | -8.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.37% | 7.23% | +0.14% |
Volatility
OCMAX vs. CEF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OCM Gold Atlas (OCMAX) is 13.81%, while Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) has a volatility of 14.73%. This indicates that OCMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OCMAX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.81% | 14.73% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.95% | 35.36% | -4.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.00% | 37.38% | +1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.83% | 23.78% | +10.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.84% | 21.58% | +12.26% |