OCMAX vs. FGPMX
OCMAX (OCM Gold Fund - Atlas Class) and FGPMX (Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6) are both Gold funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, OCMAX returned 19.26%/yr vs 19.30%/yr for FGPMX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. OCMAX charges 1.88%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for FGPMX.
Performance
OCMAX vs. FGPMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OCMAX achieves a -7.59% return, which is significantly higher than FGPMX's -12.20% return.
OCMAX
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- 6M
- -14.53%
- YTD
- -7.59%
- 1Y
- 53.97%
- 3Y*
- 47.85%
- 5Y*
- 19.26%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.20%
FGPMX
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- 6M
- -19.67%
- YTD
- -12.20%
- 1Y
- 62.14%
- 3Y*
- 46.26%
- 5Y*
- 19.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
OCMAX vs. FGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCMAX OCM Gold Fund - Atlas Class | -7.59% | 168.37% | 23.87% | 4.82% | -17.28% | -9.16% | 45.45% | 58.42% | -13.25% | -2.51% |
FGPMX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 | -12.20% | 197.33% | 18.11% | 2.35% | -23.15% | -3.66% | 44.76% | 52.07% | -17.76% | -10.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between OCMAX and FGPMX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between OCMAX and FGPMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OCMAX vs. FGPMX — Risk / Return Rank
OCMAX
FGPMX
OCMAX vs. FGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OCM Gold Fund - Atlas Class (OCMAX) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OCMAX | FGPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.25 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 1.74 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.83 | 3.85 | -0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OCMAX vs. FGPMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCMAX drawdown since its inception was -76.26%, which is greater than FGPMX's maximum drawdown of -48.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCMAX and FGPMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCMAX | FGPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.26% | -48.71% | -27.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.45% | -37.34% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.45% | -37.34% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.05% | -48.71% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.60% | -34.77% | +5.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.05% | -18.12% | -17.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.60% | 16.80% | -2.20% |
Volatility
OCMAX vs. FGPMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OCM Gold Fund - Atlas Class (OCMAX) is 12.33%, while Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 (FGPMX) has a volatility of 13.37%. This indicates that OCMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OCMAX | FGPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.33% | 13.37% | -1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.46% | 38.36% | -2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.22% | 45.92% | -3.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.06% | 34.65% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.01% | 32.83% | +1.18% |
OCMAX vs. FGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OCMAX has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FGPMX's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
OCMAX vs. FGPMX - Dividend Comparison
OCMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, less than FGPMX's 11.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGPMX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Class R6 | 11.02% | 9.67% | 12.41% | 3.18% | 0.00% | 8.79% | 10.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OCMAX OCM Gold Fund - Atlas Class | 6.40% | 5.91% | 2.97% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 5.66% | 24.55% | 6.72% | 18.48% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, OCMAX and FGPMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FGPMX has higher volatility (13.37%) compared to OCMAX (12.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCMAX dropped -76.26% vs FGPMX's -48.71%.
FGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OCMAX and FGPMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer